1999
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.5.10227523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of conventional and turbo spin-echo T1-weighted MR imaging in acute knee trauma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tears can also be seen on T2*‐weighted, or T1‐weighted fat‐suppressed GE images, but the risk of false positives is higher than with SE or fast SE (FSE) sequences. There has been a lot of debate about the accuracy of turbo SE (TSE) relative to SE sequences (17, 18). Although conventional SE is probably superior to TSE, the latter will suffice for routine clinical imaging if TE and echo train length (ETL) are short, and if advanced sequence optimization such as tailored radiofrequency pulses (reduced blurring) is used.…”
Section: Meniscimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tears can also be seen on T2*‐weighted, or T1‐weighted fat‐suppressed GE images, but the risk of false positives is higher than with SE or fast SE (FSE) sequences. There has been a lot of debate about the accuracy of turbo SE (TSE) relative to SE sequences (17, 18). Although conventional SE is probably superior to TSE, the latter will suffice for routine clinical imaging if TE and echo train length (ETL) are short, and if advanced sequence optimization such as tailored radiofrequency pulses (reduced blurring) is used.…”
Section: Meniscimentioning
confidence: 99%