2015
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aev342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of contrast flow and clinical effectiveness between a modified paramedian interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach in cervical epidural steroid injection

Abstract: Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (B-1206/159-004) and Clinical Research Information Service (KCT0000626).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…More extensive cranial spread of contrast, is consistent with the findings of major epidurographic studies (1721). Not surprisingly, the dye distribution levels (cranial and caudal) seems to depend on the volume of injected dye.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More extensive cranial spread of contrast, is consistent with the findings of major epidurographic studies (1721). Not surprisingly, the dye distribution levels (cranial and caudal) seems to depend on the volume of injected dye.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It has been shown that an interlaminar approach is safer for successful epidural steroid injections (17, 2426). Cryomicrotome epidural space studies have revealed that there are no active boundaries for distribution of solutions in epidural space (27, 28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior investigation has shown response rates defined by either 50% or greater NRS pain score reduction or PGIC rating consistent with "improvement" in symptoms of 68% to 80% depending on the duration of followup, [21][22][23][24][25][26] consistent with the observed rates in this study (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, in the cervical spine, an inter-laminar midline or paramidline injection is the option of choice, irrespective of disease categories or laterality of symptoms, because (a) an interlaminar approach is safer and more comfortable for patients, and (b) a cervical transforaminal injection has potential risk for serious complications, including cerebellar and spinal cord infarction (32,33). Choi et al (33) demonstrated that inadvertent vascular uptake and patient discomfort during procedures were significantly lower in the group in which the interlaminar approach was used than in the transforaminal approach group, and there was no statistically significant difference in symptom improvement between the two groups. A previous study by Lee et al (32) showed that a cervical paramidline injection is extremely effective in patients with cervical radiculopathy.…”
Section: Indications Choice Of Approach and Contraindicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%