2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-015-1613-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of continuous-flow and static-chamber μPCR devices through a computational study: the potential of flexible polymeric substrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c) The same PCR protocol and the same number of cycles (10) are considered for both devices. The chosen PCR protocols is 3s:4.2s:6.2s [denaturation (95 o C), annealing (55 o C), and extension (72 o C) step duration, respectively] which allows for the temperature uniformity in the CF device [13,22]. Calculations do not take into account the energy required for pumping, and the energy for preheating and final extension of the PCR mixture.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of The Computational Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c) The same PCR protocol and the same number of cycles (10) are considered for both devices. The chosen PCR protocols is 3s:4.2s:6.2s [denaturation (95 o C), annealing (55 o C), and extension (72 o C) step duration, respectively] which allows for the temperature uniformity in the CF device [13,22]. Calculations do not take into account the energy required for pumping, and the energy for preheating and final extension of the PCR mixture.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of The Computational Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical model utilized for the computational study consists of the continuity equation, the momentum conservation equation, the heat transfer equation in both solid and fluid, and the joule heating equations on both devices, coupled with a Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) temperature controller for the case of SC device. More details on the devices and the mathematical model can be found in (Papadopoulos et al 2015).…”
Section: Computational Study-simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in the energy consumption can be explained by the heat losses to the ambient at each device; the SC device has lower heat losses due to the smaller area in contact to the ambient compared to the CF device (Papadopoulos et al 2015). At low substrate thickness, the constant heat losses at the CF device exceed the energy required for the thermal cycling of the SC device.…”
Section: Computational Study-simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PCR kinetics was incorporated into the flow model to obtain the time-dependent concentration profiles of some individual species. Papadopoulos et al [ 22 ] proposed a comparison of the CFPCR and the chamber-type PCR devices through a computational investigation. The implementation of PCR kinetics to evaluate the performance of DNA amplification was shown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%