2013
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of contemporary troponin assays with the novel biomarkers, heart fatty acid binding protein and copeptin, for the early confirmation or exclusion of myocardial infarction in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain

Abstract: High-sensitivity cardiac troponin is the best single marker. Addition of HFABP to high-sensitivity troponin increased diagnostic sensitivity. Additional measurement of copeptin is not useful in the chest pain population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
40
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…6 In this research, we determined whether the detection of extremely low troponin concentrations by this assay at the time of arrival in the ED could be used immediately to exclude AMI in a proportion of patients. We found that the diagnostic performance of this assay at the conventional 99th percentile cut-off is comparable to that reported by Collinson et al 17 In a cohort of 850 patients, that group reported a sensitivity of 73.0%. Keller et al 6 reported a higher sensitivity of 90.2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…6 In this research, we determined whether the detection of extremely low troponin concentrations by this assay at the time of arrival in the ED could be used immediately to exclude AMI in a proportion of patients. We found that the diagnostic performance of this assay at the conventional 99th percentile cut-off is comparable to that reported by Collinson et al 17 In a cohort of 850 patients, that group reported a sensitivity of 73.0%. Keller et al 6 reported a higher sensitivity of 90.2%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The increase in diagnostic sensitivity as a results of adding copeptin measurements to cTnI is 14% (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21) in the meta-analysis, which is comparable to the 19.8% increase that we find in our study. 19 Two very recent reports, not included in the meta-analysis, that investigated the added value of copeptin on top of cTnI in the evaluation of chest pain patients have shown mixed results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The first study by Maisel et al 15 shows clear advantages of adding copeptin to cTnI measurement and even suggests that the addition of copeptin has the potential to rule out AMI in 58% of patients with a baseline measurement. The second study, by Collinson et al, 20 however, does not show an added diagnostic value for copeptin measurements. To date, most studies seem to suggest that the addition of copeptin to cTnI measurements improves the early rule out of AMI in patients with chest pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Three studies used hsTnI, 19,20,22 four used hsTnT 15,16,21 and one assayed both. 17 The analyser for hsTnT was produced by Roche Diagnostics in all (99% cut-off 14 ng/L), while hsTnI was measured using the Beckman-Coulter AccuTnI Enhanced (cut-off 40 ng/L) in one study, 17 Siemens TnI-Ultra assay (99% cut-off 40 ng/L) in two, 17,22 and the Abbott-Architect assay (99% cut-off: 28 and 32 ng/ L, respectively) in the remainder. 19,20 Four studies analysed their HT FABP with Randox immunoturbidimetric assay, [16][17][18]22 one by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) provided by Dainippon Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan, 20 one with QuickSenshFABP assay, 21 one by Hycult Biotech, 15 and the last with Innotrac Aiol Immunoanalyser.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When HT FABP was compared specifically with hsTnT, [15][16][17][18]21 the pooled sensitivity (60.3%, 95% CI: 55.5-64.9%) was much worse (P ¼ 0.001) though the specificity (86.9%, 95% CI: 85.4-88.3%) did not differ significantly (P ¼ 0.34). The AUC of 0.86 (SE 0.04) is significantly worse than hsTnT (P < 0.01).…”
Section: Heart-type Fatty Acid Binding Protein (Figure 2)mentioning
confidence: 97%