Abstract:Paragraph UG-28 of the ASME Section VIII, Division 1 provides rules for reinforcement of the cone-to-cylinder junction based on line of support criteria. Code Case 2286, on the other hand, provides rules based on actual stresses versus allowable stresses. In this paper, the authors compare the results of the calculations for the reinforcement of the cone-to-cylinder junction for each method. It was found that, in some cases, the reinforcement method of UG-28 will produce non-conservative results.
“…Heat transfer rate was computed from structural and thermodynamic random variables. Bardia et al [265] compared the cone-to-cylinder junction reinforcement requirements provided in two ASME codes based on different criteria.…”
“…Heat transfer rate was computed from structural and thermodynamic random variables. Bardia et al [265] compared the cone-to-cylinder junction reinforcement requirements provided in two ASME codes based on different criteria.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.