2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2008.00355.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Computed Radiography and Conventional Radiography in Detection of Small Volume Pneumoperitoneum

Abstract: The role of digital imaging is increasing as these systems are becoming more affordable and accessible. Advantages of computed radiography compared with conventional film/screen combinations include improved contrast resolution and postprocessing capabilities. Computed radiography's spatial resolution is inferior to conventional radiography; however, this limitation is considered clinically insignificant. This study prospectively compared digital imaging and conventional radiography in detecting small volume p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings were similar to that of Marolf et al, where horizontal beam projections were not significantly more sensitive than standard projections in identifying pneumoperitoneum . This was unexpected as horizontal beam radiography has been thought to be more sensitive than standard projections in differentiating gastrointestinal gas from free peritoneal gas .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our findings were similar to that of Marolf et al, where horizontal beam projections were not significantly more sensitive than standard projections in identifying pneumoperitoneum . This was unexpected as horizontal beam radiography has been thought to be more sensitive than standard projections in differentiating gastrointestinal gas from free peritoneal gas .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, despite lower spatial resolution of CR compared to conventional radiography, contrast resolution of CR is higher because of edge enhancement filters incorporated in the image reconstruction algorithm, ability to manipulate the image and a wider dynamic range for image processing . Overall, CR often has superior image quality as compared to conventional radiography and is associated with equal or higher diagnostic performance for soft tissue and osseous lesions, and it is unlikely the use of CR influenced accuracy of vertebral measurements and SRVs in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…26 The greater dynamic range of digital images and improved contrast resolution accentuates differences in opacity between tissues of different composition. 27,28 The quality of digital radiography could also be the reason for some false-positive lesions of the medial trochlear ridge. In two out of four cases, a discrete circular radiolucent area was detected in the proximal part of the medial trochlear ridge on LM (one of two) or both radiographic views (one of two).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%