2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Complications in Three Incontinent Urinary Diversions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
29
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…However, serious stomal problems may occur despite this, and may require stomal reconstruction with open surgery. In a study analyzing 16 months of followup for incontinent diversion methods, UCS was found to be more advantageous than ileal and colonic conduits (22). There is consensus in the literature that UD types cannot be recommended randomly to patients and that of all types of UD, UCS has the lowest surgical complication rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, serious stomal problems may occur despite this, and may require stomal reconstruction with open surgery. In a study analyzing 16 months of followup for incontinent diversion methods, UCS was found to be more advantageous than ileal and colonic conduits (22). There is consensus in the literature that UD types cannot be recommended randomly to patients and that of all types of UD, UCS has the lowest surgical complication rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study performed in 2008 where complications related to incontinent UDs were evaluated, extra advantages of UCN have been demonstrated over ileal, and colonic conduits during 16 months of follow-up. [9] In a more comprehensive study performed in the same year, authors reported lesser long-term complication rates for ileal conduits, when compared with all continent abdominal pouches, and orthotopic neobladder procedures. [10] Herein, our aim is to discuss justifications, and outcomes of UCN chosen as an UD procedure for our patients with various indications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this procedure uses intestinal segments, which is related to several major complications. 7 Therefore, in our cases we avoided urinary diversion using intestinal segments for complicated patients (i.e., advanced age, comorbidity, low performance status). The simplest alternative for permanent urinary diversion was cutaneous ureterostomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%