IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2006. WCNC 2006. 2006
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2006.1696615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of compand-filter schemes for reducing PAPR in OFDM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the companding transform scheme, a compander is used to decrease the signal amplitude, and hence it decreases the PAPR with a less computational complexity [17][18][19][20]. A compander and an expander are needed at the transmitter and receiver, respectively, leading to a slight increase in the hardware cost.…”
Section: The Companding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the companding transform scheme, a compander is used to decrease the signal amplitude, and hence it decreases the PAPR with a less computational complexity [17][18][19][20]. A compander and an expander are needed at the transmitter and receiver, respectively, leading to a slight increase in the hardware cost.…”
Section: The Companding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our research, compression is performed according to the well known l-law companding. The compression process can be expressed as follows [17,18]:…”
Section: The Companding Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques may be applicable in SC-FDMA systems [9][10][11][12][13][14]. The clipping technique [9,13] is the simplest one that can be used in OFDM systems, but it causes additional clipping noise, which degrades the system performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An improved version of the clipping technique is the clipping and filtering version, which can remove the out-of-band radiation but it may cause some peak regrowth letting the signal samples to exceed the clipping level at some points [9]. The second technique is the companding technique, which was originally designed for speech processing [10][11][12][13][14]. It is the most attractive PAPR reduction technique for multicarrier transmission due to its good performance and low complexity [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation