2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.meg.0000108331.52416.f1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of comorbidity prevalence in oesophageal and gastric carcinoma patients

Abstract: In terms of comorbidity at diagnosis, cardia adenocarcinoma patients resemble distal oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients rather than gastric subcardia carcinoma patients, with likewise equal age and gender distribution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, they were unable to directly respond to the question regarding the incremental effect of epirubicin and took place in a context of a striking increase in toxicity [12][13][14]. These outcomes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) failed to resolve doubts as to the applicability of 'intensified' therapies in the real-world conditions of clinical practice of our study in which patients are often elderly, with impaired performance status, and a high percentage of whom suffer chronic comorbidities [23]. The paucity of data from appropriately designed RCTs with a suitable sample size is the main reason why this issue continues to be relevant even today, projecting itself in our activity daily, debates, and research, which justifies conducting the analysis we present here [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, they were unable to directly respond to the question regarding the incremental effect of epirubicin and took place in a context of a striking increase in toxicity [12][13][14]. These outcomes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) failed to resolve doubts as to the applicability of 'intensified' therapies in the real-world conditions of clinical practice of our study in which patients are often elderly, with impaired performance status, and a high percentage of whom suffer chronic comorbidities [23]. The paucity of data from appropriately designed RCTs with a suitable sample size is the main reason why this issue continues to be relevant even today, projecting itself in our activity daily, debates, and research, which justifies conducting the analysis we present here [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This is confirmed by the higher prevalence of those diseases among patients with smoking-related tumours: cancers of the stomach, lung, bladder, and kidney (Janssen-Heijnen et al , 1998; Koppert et al , 2004). Diabetes was more frequent among low SES for patients with cancers of the colorectum, pancreas, lung, breast, corpus uteri or prostate, or melanoma or NHL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Another limitation is the lack of information on patients' co-morbidity status, which may vary between different oesophago-gastric cancers,[30] and deprivation groups. However, if more deprived patients had a greater co-morbidity burden, one could again expect this to have mainly influenced surgical treatment use (because of the greater anaesthetic risk of patients with higher co-morbidity burden).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%