2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of commercial and in-house real-time PCR platforms for 15 parasites and microsporidia in human stool samples without a gold standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
10
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher prevalence found in younger children (81% of the infections) is in accordance with previous observations [ 19 ]. The observed differences in positive findings for G. intestinalis by microscopy and real-time PCR can be explained by the higher sensitivity of the well-established PCR technique [ 3 ] and is a generally well-known phenomenon [ 20 ]. Furthermore, the low sensitivity of microscopy might suggest pathogen concentrations close to or below the microscopic detection threshold, making low-replicative colonization more likely than high-replicative infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The higher prevalence found in younger children (81% of the infections) is in accordance with previous observations [ 19 ]. The observed differences in positive findings for G. intestinalis by microscopy and real-time PCR can be explained by the higher sensitivity of the well-established PCR technique [ 3 ] and is a generally well-known phenomenon [ 20 ]. Furthermore, the low sensitivity of microscopy might suggest pathogen concentrations close to or below the microscopic detection threshold, making low-replicative colonization more likely than high-replicative infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also have to state that RT-PCR is not the optimum diagnostic procedure for the detection of E. vermicularis . The low proportion of detected E. vermicularis might be, in part, a consequence of insufficient sensitivity (56%) [ 3 ]. Thus, it is likely that infestations with low worm burdens may have gone undetected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 10 ], enteropathogenic protozoa ( Entamoeba histolytica, G. duodenalis, Cyclospora cayetanensis, Cryptosporidium spp.) [ 11 ] as well as intestinal helminths (African Schistosoma spp., Ancylostoma spp., A. lumbricoides, Enterobius vermicularis, Hymenolepis nana, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis, Taenia saginata, Taenia solium , and Trichuris trichiura ) [ 11 ]. PCR assay characteristics as calculated based on evaluation studies have been detailed elsewhere [ 10 , 11 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction was performed a few weeks to months after each collection period. Real-time PCR for C. cayetanensis was performed according to the protocol by Verweij and colleagues [40] with the adaptation as detailed by Frickmann and colleagues [41] on RotorGene Q cyclers (Qiagen). Within each run, a negative control based on PCR-grade water and a positive control based on a plasmid as previously described [41] were included.…”
Section: Microscopy and Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (Pcr)-basmentioning
confidence: 99%