Comparison of Columnar, Surface, and UAS Profiles of Absorbing Aerosol Optical Depth and Single-Scattering Albedo in South-East Poland

Abstract

The impact of absorbing aerosols on climate is complex, with their potential positive or negative forcing, depending on many factors, including their height distribution and reflective properties of the underlying background. Measurement data is very limited, due to insufficient remote sensing methods dedicated to the retrieval of their vertical distribution. Columnar values of absorbing aerosol optical depth (AAOD) and single scattering albedo (SSA) are retrieved by the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET). However, the number of available results is low due to sky condition and aerosol optical depth (AOD) limitation. Presented research describes results of field campaigns in Strzyżów (South-East Poland, Eastern Europe) dedicated to the comparison of the absorption coefficient and SSA measurements performed with on-ground in-situ devices (aethalomter, nephelometer), small unmanned aerial system (UAS) carrying micro-aethalometer, as well as with lidar/ceilometer. An important aspect is the comparison of measurement results with those delivered by AERONET. Correlation of absorption to scattering coefficients measured on ground (0.79) and correlation of extinction on ground to AOD measured by AERONET (0.77) was visibly higher than correlation between AOD and AAOD retrieved by AERONET (0.56). Columnar SSA was weakly correlated with ground SSA (higher values of columnar SSA), which were mainly explained by hygroscopic effects, increasing scattering coefficient in ambient (wet conditions), and partly high uncertainty of SSA retrieval. AAOD derived with the use of profiles from UAS up to PBL height, was estimated to contribute in average to 37% of the total AAOD. A method of AAOD estimation, in the whole troposphere, with use of measured vertical profiles of absorption coefficient and extinction coefficient profiles from lidars was proposed. AAOD measured with this method has poor correlation with AERONET data, however for some measurements, within PBL, AAOD was higher than reported by AERONET, suggesting potential underestimation in photometric measurement under particular conditions. Correlation of absorption coefficient in profile to on ground measurements decrease with altitude. Measurements of SSA from drones agree well with ground measurements and are lower than results from AERONET, which suggests a larger contribution of absorbing aerosols. As an alternative for AAOD estimation in case of lack of AERONET AAOD data simple models are proposed, which base on AOD scaling with SSA measured with different methods. Proposed solution increase potential of absorption coefficient measurements in vertical profiles and columns of the atmosphere. Presented solutions make measurements of absorption coefficients in vertical profiles more affordable and allow rough estimation of columnar values for the whole atmosphere.

Evaluation of Two Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for the Measurement of Ambient Aerosol Scattering Coefficient and Ångström Exponent

“…In addition, Markowicz et al [34] developed a method for retrieving the profiles of aerosol optical properties (single-scattering albedo) on the basis of a combination of soundings made with a miniaturized aethalometer (to measure the absorption coefficient) mounted on a tethered balloon and Raman lidar (to measure the aerosol extinction coefficient) profiling. Chilinski et al [36] used a UAV with miniaturized devices together with ground-based lidar measurements for the estimation of absorbing AOD. However, both methods are limited to the vertical range between lidar overlap-free altitude (usually several hundred meters) and the maximum range of the tethered balloons or UAV soundings (approx.…”

A Decade of Poland-AOD Aerosol Research Network Observations

“…The methodology of integrating data obtained from UAV, tethered balloon, and cable car profiling with lidar observations was developed [55,64]. This method allows the SSA profile to be obtained and extends the lidar signal below the overlap latitude.…”

Automated Aerosol Classification from Spectral UV Measurements Using Machine Learning Clustering

“…While in situ instruments (e.g., nephelometers, aethalometers, mass spectrometers, particle counters) are excellent in identifying these individual components near the earth's surface, it is both challenging and costly to perform such measurements in elevated layers. Remote sensing instruments (e.g., sunphotometers, spectrophotometers, lidars), on the other hand, allow aerosol monitoring in distant atmospheric regions (e.g., [3,4]).…”