2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11105-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of colorectal cancer screening between people with and without disability: a nationwide matched cohort study

Abstract: Background The World Health Organization has recognized that people with disability are among the most marginalized in the world. This study’s objective was to investigate the differences in the probability of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) between people with disability and without disability in Taiwan. Methods The study participants included people with and without disability from the Disability Registr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qualitative data shows that women with disabilities report multiple barriers to accessing breast and cervical cancer screening, including physical barriers, cost, a lack of knowledge, fear, and attitudes of healthcare workers [ 46 , 47 , 48 ]. Studies have also shown that colorectal cancer screening is less frequent among people with disabilities compared to those without [ 49 , 50 ]. More broadly, it is well established that people with disabilities face greater challenges in accessing health care services [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative data shows that women with disabilities report multiple barriers to accessing breast and cervical cancer screening, including physical barriers, cost, a lack of knowledge, fear, and attitudes of healthcare workers [ 46 , 47 , 48 ]. Studies have also shown that colorectal cancer screening is less frequent among people with disabilities compared to those without [ 49 , 50 ]. More broadly, it is well established that people with disabilities face greater challenges in accessing health care services [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taiwan's nationwide colorectal cancer screening program implemented in 2004 has been effective in reducing colorectal cancer mortality in this country 46 . Low participation in colorectal screening was observed in patients with intellectual and developmental disability, dementia, or autism in Taiwan 47 . The relatively low incidence rate of colorectal cancer in patients with schizophrenia in the present study may be associated with a low rate of participation in screening programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…46 Low participation in colorectal screening was observed in patients with intellectual and developmental disability, dementia, or autism in Taiwan. 47 The relatively low incidence rate of colorectal cancer in patients with schizophrenia in the present study may be associated with a low rate of participation in screening programs. Delayed diagnosis may also contribute to the observed higher mortality rate and relative MIR for colorectal cancer.…”
Section: Colon Cancermentioning
confidence: 58%
“…A recent meta-analysis from the USA showed that women with disabilities have 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84) lower odds of attending breast cancer screening and have 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45–0.88) lower odds of attending cervical cancer screening, compared to women without disabilities. A recent study from Taiwan reported that the probability of receiving colorectal cancer screening in people in the four categories of disability (intellectual and developmental disability, dementia, multiple disabilities, and moving functional limitation; OR = 0.53, 0.55, 0.62 and 0.81, respectively) was significantly lower than that in the general population [ 24 , 26 ]. Two recent scoping reviews found that patients with intellectual disabilities may be at risk of experiencing inequities at various points during cancer clinical pathways, which as a consequence could have an impact on their overall and cancer-specific mortality and quality of life; it is thus of the outmost importance to identify and address these disparities [ 25 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%