2017
DOI: 10.1166/asl.2017.10253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clustering Algorithms Using Quality Metrics with Invariant Features Extracted from Plant Leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure fairer conditions in evaluation, this work finds the optimal clustering method for agriculture data analysis. Proposed work adopts the external quality metrics [3] like Purity, Homogeneity, Completeness, V Measure, Rand Index, Precision, Recall and F measure to compare the PAM, CLARA and DBSCAN clustering methods.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To ensure fairer conditions in evaluation, this work finds the optimal clustering method for agriculture data analysis. Proposed work adopts the external quality metrics [3] like Purity, Homogeneity, Completeness, V Measure, Rand Index, Precision, Recall and F measure to compare the PAM, CLARA and DBSCAN clustering methods.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cluster analysis divides data into well-formed groups. Well-formed clusters should capture the "natural" structure of the data [3]. This paper focuses on PAM, CLARA and DBSCAN clustering methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is helpful to government in framing policies related to crops such as crop insurance policies, supply chain operation policies. Knowing what crops has been grown, and how much area of it had been shown historically, combined with the prices at which it could have been sold at the nearest market-place provides the income-growth profile of the farmer [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the cluster divides data into well organized groups. The natural structure of the data is captured by these well-formed groups [3,4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%