2006
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2005-2368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clinical, Ultrasonographic, and Biochemical Differences at the Beginning of Puberty in Healthy Girls Born Either Small for Gestational Age or Appropriate for Gestational Age: Preliminary Results

Abstract: In a preliminary sample of lean, healthy girls recruited from the community born either SGA or AGA, we observed slight hormonal differences at the beginning of puberty. Longitudinal follow-up of this cohort will allow us to understand whether these differences are maintained and have a clinical impact in their pubertal development.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
17
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort, by design, we did not include small-for-gestational-age infants, but we observed that those born with a birth weight <3 kg or with a birth length <48 cm had no increased risk of high DHEAS at 7 years. Our findings are in line with our own experience in early pubertal girls of low birth weight gain and with other groups which have not demonstrated this association [7,[34][35][36] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our cohort, by design, we did not include small-for-gestational-age infants, but we observed that those born with a birth weight <3 kg or with a birth length <48 cm had no increased risk of high DHEAS at 7 years. Our findings are in line with our own experience in early pubertal girls of low birth weight gain and with other groups which have not demonstrated this association [7,[34][35][36] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Discordant findings were reported by a Chilean group: at the beginning of puberty (Tanner stage 2 of breast development), SGA girls with BMI between 10th and 95th percentiles had higher basal and GnRH-stimulated estradiol levels compared with AGA girls, whereas basal FSH and LH concentrations were similar in SGA and AGA children; 2 years later, FSH concentration was lower, but GnRH-stimulated LH and basal estradiol levels were higher in SGA children compared with AGA. Authors suggest that these differences may allow faster transition through puberty in SGA girls [7,41]. …”
Section: Patterns Of Puberty In Children Born Sgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hernandez et al [41] reported divergent results. At the beginning of puberty, SGA girls had slightly larger uterine size, ovarian volume and number of follicles compared to AGA girls.…”
Section: Gonadal Morphology and Fertilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In women born SGA, smaller ovaries and uterus and lower anti-Mullerian hormone levels -a marker of follicle pool size -have been described (Ibanez et al, 2003). These findings could not be replicated by others (Hernandez et al, 2006;Jensen et al, 2007). In a large cohort, it was recently shown that being born SGA does not have a negative effect on gonadal function in adult men.…”
Section: Puberty In Short Children Born Small For Gestational Agementioning
confidence: 97%