2017
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(17)34579-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes: Bivalirudin With Transfemoral Versus Heparin With Transradial in Patients With St Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…50 However, in a large RCT and a retrospective analysis, there was no difference in the primary outcome, including mortality, among patients undergoing primary PCI between radial and femoral access. 51,52 In the setting of OHCA, especially if there is concomitant shock, traditionally the femoral access site has been preferred-due to F I G U R E 1 Algorithm of clinical factors available to aid in decision-making along the continuum of care of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Vascular Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…50 However, in a large RCT and a retrospective analysis, there was no difference in the primary outcome, including mortality, among patients undergoing primary PCI between radial and femoral access. 51,52 In the setting of OHCA, especially if there is concomitant shock, traditionally the femoral access site has been preferred-due to F I G U R E 1 Algorithm of clinical factors available to aid in decision-making along the continuum of care of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Vascular Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radial access is associated with reduced risk of bleeding complications compared with femoral access among patients undergoing PCI for ACS 50 . However, in a large RCT and a retrospective analysis, there was no difference in the primary outcome, including mortality, among patients undergoing primary PCI between radial and femoral access 51,52 . In the setting of OHCA, especially if there is concomitant shock, traditionally the femoral access site has been preferred—due to concerns of vasospasm, increasing procedural time to reperfusion and convenience of restricting the working field to groin area if hemodynamic support is required.…”
Section: Access and Peri‐procedural Antithombotic Therapy During Pci mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the access site of the procedure, despite the theoretical advantages of the radial, excellent results have also been reported with the transfemoral approach [3]. Notably, in patients undergoing primary PCI without cardiogenic shock who are treated with bivalirudin (as in our case), the differences in mortality or bleeding rates related to the access site are negligible [12]. Bivalirubin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, was used as an alternative to heparin since it is the only agent proved to be safe in cases with thrombocytopenia [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%