2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics, Natural History and Predictors of Disease Progression in Patients With Degenerative Mitral Stenosis Versus Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) patients with CMS had a lower mean TMPG despite comparable 3D-TEE-derived-MVA, (4) more patients with RMS had dyspnea on exertion, and (5) independent determinants of dyspnea were pressure half time in the RMS group; MVA by 3D planimetry and estimated right atrial pressure in the DMS group; and left ventricular ejection fraction in the CMS group. There have been several reports on the comparison between RMS and DMS; however, to the best of our knowledge, there are few reports that compare clinical presentation and echocardiographic characteristics between CMS and another type of MS. 16,17 In the present study, the RMS group had the highest prevalence of dyspnea among the three groups, and the determinant of dyspnea in this group was pressure half time. RMS patients had the smallest effective orifice area using the continuity equation among patients with the three types of MS, thus, the hemodynamic severity of MS was worst.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) patients with CMS had a lower mean TMPG despite comparable 3D-TEE-derived-MVA, (4) more patients with RMS had dyspnea on exertion, and (5) independent determinants of dyspnea were pressure half time in the RMS group; MVA by 3D planimetry and estimated right atrial pressure in the DMS group; and left ventricular ejection fraction in the CMS group. There have been several reports on the comparison between RMS and DMS; however, to the best of our knowledge, there are few reports that compare clinical presentation and echocardiographic characteristics between CMS and another type of MS. 16,17 In the present study, the RMS group had the highest prevalence of dyspnea among the three groups, and the determinant of dyspnea in this group was pressure half time. RMS patients had the smallest effective orifice area using the continuity equation among patients with the three types of MS, thus, the hemodynamic severity of MS was worst.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…In this retrospective study, we investigated differences in the clinical presentation and echocardiographic characteristics, including determinants of dyspnea on exertion, among three etiologies of MS. We found that: (1) patients with RMS were younger, (2) patients with DMS and those with CMS had more cardiovascular comorbidities, (3) patients with CMS had a lower mean TMPG despite comparable 3D‐TEE‐derived‐MVA, (4) more patients with RMS had dyspnea on exertion, and (5) independent determinants of dyspnea were pressure half time in the RMS group; MVA by 3D planimetry and estimated right atrial pressure in the DMS group; and left ventricular ejection fraction in the CMS group. There have been several reports on the comparison between RMS and DMS; however, to the best of our knowledge, there are few reports that compare clinical presentation and echocardiographic characteristics between CMS and another type of MS 16,17 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 24 , 25 Previous studies characterizing the natural history of rheumatic MS included a small number of patients (<100 patients) or a relatively short follow‐up duration (<5 years). 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 Moreover, most of these studies focused predominantly on changes in a few specific values, such as MVA or mean diastolic pressure gradient. 26 , 27 , 28 Although several studies have reported the association between PASP and postoperative prognosis in patients with MS, the literature on PASP in MS is scarce.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 Moreover, most of these studies focused predominantly on changes in a few specific values, such as MVA or mean diastolic pressure gradient. 26 , 27 , 28 Although several studies have reported the association between PASP and postoperative prognosis in patients with MS, the literature on PASP in MS is scarce. 9 , 31 Furthermore, there is a paucity of studies evaluating serial changes in PASP and their effects on MS progression and outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 However, more recent study from Japan did not show relationship between severity of MAC and mitral disease progression. 26 On the other hand, severity of DMS as assessed by mean pressure gradient was consistently associated with progression of MS. 24,26 Treatment of DMS is also challenging for both surgical and transcatheter approach. 30 Percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty is usually not indicated for DMS.…”
Section: Valvular Heart Disease and MCmentioning
confidence: 96%