2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-018-0882-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. putida keratitis at a tertiary referral center: a retrospective study

Abstract: BackgroundTo compare clinical characteristics and antibiotic susceptibilities in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) and P. putida (PP) keratitis at a tertiary referral center in South Korea.MethodsForty-nine cases of inpatients with culture-proven PA and PP keratitis were reviewed retrospectively between January 1998 and December 2017. We excluded cases of polymicrobial infection. Epidemiology, predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, antibiotic susceptibilities, and treatment outcomes were compa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher incidence of fungal keratitis in male patients may be due to our social set up where males are more exposed to outdoors than women and it was comparable with other studies done by Al-Hatim et al and CH Cho et al 14,15 Ideally every corneal scraping should be sent for PCR and culture for diagnosis. PCR takes only two to three hours and culture takes up to 35 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Higher incidence of fungal keratitis in male patients may be due to our social set up where males are more exposed to outdoors than women and it was comparable with other studies done by Al-Hatim et al and CH Cho et al 14,15 Ideally every corneal scraping should be sent for PCR and culture for diagnosis. PCR takes only two to three hours and culture takes up to 35 days.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, in a prospective observational study among patients undergoing cataract surgery in the USA, Ta et al showed that almost eight of every ten ocular specimen obtained from patients eyes had a bacteria etiology 26 . On the one hand, estimates from the present study is signi cantly higher and varies substantially compared to studies in China 13,18 , Iran 20 , South Korea 14 and Nepal 15 with prevalence estimates far lower than 50% [13][14][15]18,20 . Although geographical settings, study population, seasonality and laboratory procedures could account for such variations as reported earlier, a plausible reason for our observation may be attributable to the fact that our study unlike previous investigations enrolled patients from multiple eye care facilities hence the burden of infections maybe summative.…”
Section: Bacteria Etiology Of External Ocular and Periocular Infections Among Study Participantscontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Though microscopic, the wide biodiversity of bacteria pathogens makes it burdensome for ophthalmic clinicians and physicians when selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy in routine clinical management of ocular and periocular infections. Previously, authors from several geographical jurisdictions have investigated the burden and etiology of bacteria eye infections, however, outcomes from these studies varied considerably [13][14][15]18,20,25,26 . The prevalence estimates of medical conditions such as bacteria ocular and periocular infections are critical in informing eye care service delivery and in the development of policies to strengthen eye care practices yet there is presently limited ophthalmic data to propagate such transitions within the Ghanaian context.…”
Section: Bacteria Etiology Of External Ocular and Periocular Infections Among Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The duration of symptoms was defined as the interval between the onset of symptoms and the initial visit. The corneal ulcers were classified into central or peripheral lesions based on the half radius of the cornea [ 22 ]. The size of the infiltrate/scar and epithelial defect size were calculated by geometric mean of longest diameter and longest perpendicular, respectively [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%