1988
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1988.03410120085032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Clinical Assessment With APACHE II for Predicting Mortality Risk in Patients Admitted to a Medical Intensive Care Unit

Abstract: The APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) system has been widely used as an objective means of predicting outcome in critically ill patients. We prospectively evaluated patients consecutively admitted to the medical intensive care unit to compare the predictive accuracy of APACHE II with clinical assessment by critical care personnel. At the time of admission to the intensive care unit, the house staff and nurse responsible for each patient were asked to estimate the patient's hospital mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An elevated number of leukocytes is considered to be important for the severely sick, which is reflected in a higher APACHE II score [15], describing the general clinical state [13,15,16]. Regardless of these facts, we found no correlation of WBC with either prognosis or clinical state after CA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An elevated number of leukocytes is considered to be important for the severely sick, which is reflected in a higher APACHE II score [15], describing the general clinical state [13,15,16]. Regardless of these facts, we found no correlation of WBC with either prognosis or clinical state after CA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…At 8.00 a.m. on the day following the CA (day 1) and the next day (day 2) the clinical state of the patients after CA was determined by means of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), assessing the state of the central nervous system [13,14], and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), describing the general clinical state [13,15,16]. Values of the scales of the patients after CA are exhibited in Table II.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical estimation is often based on subjective parameters and physicians can be overconfident in their predictive abilities [17-20]. Independent risk stratification may provide clinicians with additional information to guide clinical decision-making, but further evaluation is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with cirrhosis, this “state of health” is influenced not only by liver disease severity which is well-captured by the MELD score, but by factors such as age, muscle mass, nutritional status, and non-liver related co-morbidities that also contribute to wait-list outcomes but are not captured by the MELD score. There is robust rationale for the application of this clinical judgment, as several studies have shown that clinicians can predict outcomes in hospitalized or elderly patients (4-7). However, while inclusion of clinical assessment to liver transplant decisions may be justified, it is subjective and, as such, may differ from one clinician to another and lacks transparency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%