2009
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2008.144147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical and photographic assessment of trachoma

Abstract: Active trachoma in young people and scarring in older people remain as problems in Aboriginal communities. Photographic assessment is a useful technique, but in comparison with clinical assessment it can result in overestimation of scoring for trachoma for inflammation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While we took every means possible to select the most capable, reliable graders, there will always be the chance of systematic misclassification. Taking photographs of the everted lid has been shown to provide an objective measure of findings in some studies, but not in all settings and not at the scale of the current study [29][31]. We used photographs only during the standardization of the graders but capable cameras were not deployed with any of the 34 survey teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we took every means possible to select the most capable, reliable graders, there will always be the chance of systematic misclassification. Taking photographs of the everted lid has been shown to provide an objective measure of findings in some studies, but not in all settings and not at the scale of the current study [29][31]. We used photographs only during the standardization of the graders but capable cameras were not deployed with any of the 34 survey teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6,13,[20][21][22] Photo grading has advantages over field grading. (1) Exam conditions can be standardized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is further compounded by the occurrence of repeated episodes of infection. Also important is the relative lack of precision in assessing clinical status with the WHO simplified trachoma grading system [14], [15], which was designed to be learnt and used by local health workers and generally has a high level of reproducibility [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%