2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-018-01967-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of clinical and neuropathological diagnoses of neurodegenerative diseases in two centres from the Brains for Dementia Research (BDR) cohort

Abstract: Early detection and accurate diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders may provide better epidemiological data, closer monitoring of disease progression and enable more specialised intervention. We analysed the clinical records and pathology of brain donations from 180 patients from two Brains for Dementia Research cohorts to determine the agreement between in-life clinical diagnosis and post-mortem pathological results. Clinical diagnosis was extracted from medical records and cases assigned into broad clinica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was more likely for the AD with visual hallucinations and dementia with Lewy body groups. The rate of change of diagnosis was similar to other post-mortem series [40, 41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This was more likely for the AD with visual hallucinations and dementia with Lewy body groups. The rate of change of diagnosis was similar to other post-mortem series [40, 41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An important point to emphasize is that these CSF biomarkers seem to have a prognostic value, independent of the final clinical diagnosis. In a recent study by Selvackadunco et al [ 24 ], clinical and post mortem histopathological diagnoses matched in only 115 out of 180 patients (64%). Despite recent advances in diagnostic biomarkers, misdiagnosis or incomplete diagnosis for patients with cognitive decline is still a frequent problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It relies on data gathered through clinical examination, patient and carer interview, with differential diagnosis guided by structural and/or glucose metabolism imaging [1]. The limitations of this approach have been highlighted by the demonstration that a significant proportion of patients diagnosed with AD have their diagnosis changed through in-vivo amyloid positron emission tomography [2] or post-mortem studies [3,4]. Syndrome-based AD definition is particularly problematic in the context of preclinical or prodromal disease which is where the major efforts of diseasemodification are currently focused [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%