1980
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(80)90278-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of circadian susceptibility to LiCl-induced taste aversion learning between preweanling and adult rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the several factors that might have contributed to this finding was the younger age of the subjects in Experiment 2 (90 days) relative to those in Experiment 1 (181-197 days) and those in Hobbs and Elkins (1976) (180 days). Although young adult rats generally acquire stronger taste aversions than rat pups (e.g., Baker, Baker, & Kesner, 1977;Caza, Steinert, & Spear, 1980), there is no clear evidence that aversion strength is enhanced by further maturation (Franchina & Horowitz, 1982;Guanowsky & Misanin, 1983). Nevertheless, we returned to the use of older subjects in the next experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the several factors that might have contributed to this finding was the younger age of the subjects in Experiment 2 (90 days) relative to those in Experiment 1 (181-197 days) and those in Hobbs and Elkins (1976) (180 days). Although young adult rats generally acquire stronger taste aversions than rat pups (e.g., Baker, Baker, & Kesner, 1977;Caza, Steinert, & Spear, 1980), there is no clear evidence that aversion strength is enhanced by further maturation (Franchina & Horowitz, 1982;Guanowsky & Misanin, 1983). Nevertheless, we returned to the use of older subjects in the next experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%