2005
DOI: 10.1080/00016480510026278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ciliary wave disorders measured by image analysis and electron microscopy

Abstract: The average number of cilia analyzed by EM was 102.50 (range 48-136). The mean CWDs determined using IA and EM were 28.25+/-4.84 degrees and 23.59+/-8.16 degrees, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the CWDs determined using these two methods (Spearman's correlation coefficient =0.648; p =0.043). The mean CBF of sphenoid mucosa was 10.50+/-2.20 Hz.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiments aiming at the characterization of spatiotemporal features of mucociliary phenomena on the tracheal ciliary epithelium are based on the approach of excising a rectangular piece of the cylindric trachea (e.g. [7,[23][24][25]), which changes the boundary conditions from cylindrical to open. The excision might influence the collective dynamical behavior of the system.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments aiming at the characterization of spatiotemporal features of mucociliary phenomena on the tracheal ciliary epithelium are based on the approach of excising a rectangular piece of the cylindric trachea (e.g. [7,[23][24][25]), which changes the boundary conditions from cylindrical to open. The excision might influence the collective dynamical behavior of the system.…”
Section: Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method offers several advantages, including ease of use, relatively low cost of equipment, and highly compatible digital recording media. Many digital video-image methods utilize image processing based on difference image for calculation of CBF [9,10]. However, measurement of difference image with overlapping objects or slow down performance according to shape of object is difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%