“…This study showed that using 11 % of Giemsa solution for 45 min could lead to better quality of stained chromosomes in both fish species and in the polyploid fish. Most of the previous methods employed concentrations similar to this study but with a lower incubation period (e.g., Hussain and McAndrew 1994;Pradeep et al 2011;Shao et al 2010). Some other studies used lower concentrations such as 4-5 % (FoppBayat and Woznicki 2006;Inokuchi et al 1994;Kligerman and Bloom 1977) or higher concentrations like 14 % (Karami et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In turn, mitotic rate is a factor influenced by species and environmental parameters (Shelton et al 1997). By comparing metaphase chromosome numbers and mitotic rates in different life stages of Cynoglossus semilaevis, Shao et al (2010) found a higher mitotic rate in the larvae compared to the juveniles and adults. In a similar way, differences in mitotic division rates may explain why in this study different aged C. gariepinus and D. rerio larvae responded differently to the colchicine concentration and duration, and to the hypotonic solutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Larvae were incubated in 0.01, 0.025, or 0.05 % colchicine for 3 or 5 h. The procedure was followed as described by Shao et al 2010; Table 1). Finally, on each slide, clear metaphase chromosome spreads were counted.…”
Section: Colchicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, methods targeting embryonic and larval stages of fish have faced difficulties in achieving a reliable number of identifiable and wide-spread metaphase chromosomes probably due to the variations in mitotic cell division rates among different fish species (Shao et al 2010). In conventional chromosome preparation protocols, a spindle poison (e.g., colchicine) is employed to arrest the cells at their metaphase stage (Kligerman and Bloom 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or 0.075 M KCl solution(Pradeep et al 2011) for 30 min, followed by the procedure ofShao et al (2010; Table 1). Finally, clear chromosome spreads were counted on each slide.FixationFollowing the optimization of colchicine concentration and incubation period, and hypotonic solution for the different larval age in each species, larvae were fixed in chilled Carnoy's fixative solution (ethanol:glacial acetic acid 3:1 vol/vol) for a total of 40 min.…”
To date, several protocols have been developed to achieve clear and identifiable metaphase chromosome spreads from larvae of a single fish species. However, the efficiency of these protocols in more than one fish species has barely been compared within a single study. This work investigated the dependency of chromosome preparation parameters including colchicine concentration (0.01, 0.025, 0.05 %) and exposure duration (3, 5 h), hypotonic solution (distilled water, 0.075 M KCl solution), and Giemsa stain solution concentration (6, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 14 %) and incubation period (15, 30, 45, and 60 min) to two species of fish, the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and the zebrafish (Danio rerio) at different larval ages (0, 2, and 4 days post-hatch, dph). Results indicated that larval age, colchicine concentration and/or incubation time, and/or the type of hypotonic solution varied with fish species while staining the chromosomes with 11 % Giemsa solution for 45 min can be maintained regardless of the species or larval age. Interestingly, employing the selected values from diploid C. gariepinus experiment to prepare metaphase chromosomes from larvae of their triploid siblings proved to be efficient.
“…This study showed that using 11 % of Giemsa solution for 45 min could lead to better quality of stained chromosomes in both fish species and in the polyploid fish. Most of the previous methods employed concentrations similar to this study but with a lower incubation period (e.g., Hussain and McAndrew 1994;Pradeep et al 2011;Shao et al 2010). Some other studies used lower concentrations such as 4-5 % (FoppBayat and Woznicki 2006;Inokuchi et al 1994;Kligerman and Bloom 1977) or higher concentrations like 14 % (Karami et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In turn, mitotic rate is a factor influenced by species and environmental parameters (Shelton et al 1997). By comparing metaphase chromosome numbers and mitotic rates in different life stages of Cynoglossus semilaevis, Shao et al (2010) found a higher mitotic rate in the larvae compared to the juveniles and adults. In a similar way, differences in mitotic division rates may explain why in this study different aged C. gariepinus and D. rerio larvae responded differently to the colchicine concentration and duration, and to the hypotonic solutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Larvae were incubated in 0.01, 0.025, or 0.05 % colchicine for 3 or 5 h. The procedure was followed as described by Shao et al 2010; Table 1). Finally, on each slide, clear metaphase chromosome spreads were counted.…”
Section: Colchicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, methods targeting embryonic and larval stages of fish have faced difficulties in achieving a reliable number of identifiable and wide-spread metaphase chromosomes probably due to the variations in mitotic cell division rates among different fish species (Shao et al 2010). In conventional chromosome preparation protocols, a spindle poison (e.g., colchicine) is employed to arrest the cells at their metaphase stage (Kligerman and Bloom 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or 0.075 M KCl solution(Pradeep et al 2011) for 30 min, followed by the procedure ofShao et al (2010; Table 1). Finally, clear chromosome spreads were counted on each slide.FixationFollowing the optimization of colchicine concentration and incubation period, and hypotonic solution for the different larval age in each species, larvae were fixed in chilled Carnoy's fixative solution (ethanol:glacial acetic acid 3:1 vol/vol) for a total of 40 min.…”
To date, several protocols have been developed to achieve clear and identifiable metaphase chromosome spreads from larvae of a single fish species. However, the efficiency of these protocols in more than one fish species has barely been compared within a single study. This work investigated the dependency of chromosome preparation parameters including colchicine concentration (0.01, 0.025, 0.05 %) and exposure duration (3, 5 h), hypotonic solution (distilled water, 0.075 M KCl solution), and Giemsa stain solution concentration (6, 8, 10, 11, 12, and 14 %) and incubation period (15, 30, 45, and 60 min) to two species of fish, the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and the zebrafish (Danio rerio) at different larval ages (0, 2, and 4 days post-hatch, dph). Results indicated that larval age, colchicine concentration and/or incubation time, and/or the type of hypotonic solution varied with fish species while staining the chromosomes with 11 % Giemsa solution for 45 min can be maintained regardless of the species or larval age. Interestingly, employing the selected values from diploid C. gariepinus experiment to prepare metaphase chromosomes from larvae of their triploid siblings proved to be efficient.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.