The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.7862/rz.2020.mmr.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Chosen Wind Energy Aspects of Visegrad Countries in Context of Eu Sustainable Energy Sector Development Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slovak struggle for that direction should be underlined and is illustrated by a fair share of hydropower, succeeding in an increase for about 4% in 2019. On the other hand, due to geographical reasons and wind density areas (Polaszczyk and Markiewicz, 2020) Poland is a clear leader in V4 in using wind power despite the decrease in RES share in 2015-18 years, caused by heavy coal dependence and no working nuclear power plant. Hungary also lacks in means of RES share as it is strongly dependent on natural gas transits from East.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slovak struggle for that direction should be underlined and is illustrated by a fair share of hydropower, succeeding in an increase for about 4% in 2019. On the other hand, due to geographical reasons and wind density areas (Polaszczyk and Markiewicz, 2020) Poland is a clear leader in V4 in using wind power despite the decrease in RES share in 2015-18 years, caused by heavy coal dependence and no working nuclear power plant. Hungary also lacks in means of RES share as it is strongly dependent on natural gas transits from East.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%