2022
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.24673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of chimeric antigen receptor‐T cell‐mediated cytotoxicity assays with suspension tumor cells using plate‐based image cytometry method

Abstract: In the recent decade, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has revolutionized strategies for cancer treatments due to its highly effective clinical efficacy and response for B cell malignancies. The success of CAR-T cell therapy has stimulated the increase in the research and development of various CAR constructs to target different tumor types. Therefore, a robust and efficient in vitro potency assay is needed to quickly identify potential CAR gene design from a library of construct candidates. Imag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CD19 + (K562 CD19-tdTomato), CD20 + (K562 CD20-GFP), CD19 + CD20 + (Raji-GFP) or non-relevant K562 BCMA-GFP target cells were seeded at 5 × 10 3 cells per well in 96-well culture plates (Corning), and control non-transfected Pan-T or CAR-T cells were added at an E:T ratio of 5:1, 1:1, 1:3 or 1:10. Cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells on target cells was then assessed as previously described 54 . Briefly, a Celigo imaging cytometer was used to measure the percentage of live target cells at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of co-culture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD19 + (K562 CD19-tdTomato), CD20 + (K562 CD20-GFP), CD19 + CD20 + (Raji-GFP) or non-relevant K562 BCMA-GFP target cells were seeded at 5 × 10 3 cells per well in 96-well culture plates (Corning), and control non-transfected Pan-T or CAR-T cells were added at an E:T ratio of 5:1, 1:1, 1:3 or 1:10. Cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells on target cells was then assessed as previously described 54 . Briefly, a Celigo imaging cytometer was used to measure the percentage of live target cells at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of co-culture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CD19 + (K562 CD19‐tdTomato), CD20 + (K562 CD20‐GFP), CD19 + CD20 + (Raji‐GFP) or non‐relevant K562 BCMA‐GFP target cells were seeded at 5 × 10 3 cells per well in 96‐well culture plates (Corning), and control non‐transfected Pan‐T or CAR‐T cells were added at an E:T ratio of 5:1, 1:1, 1:3 or 1:10. Cytotoxicity of CAR‐T cells on target cells was then assessed as previously described 16 . Briefly, a Celigo imaging cytometer was used to measure the percentage of live target cells at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of co‐culture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells on target cells was then assessed as previously described. 16 Briefly, a Celigo imaging cytometer was used to measure the percentage of live target cells at 0, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of co-culture. Cell aggregates were separated by pipetting prior to Celigo imaging.…”
Section: In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%