1960
DOI: 10.1109/jrproc.1960.287394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Chemical and Electric Propulsion Systems for Interplanetary Travel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He proposed to use laser in an indirect manner (i.e., remote energy source) instead of ablating the propellant by using chemical or electrical means. Different propulsion schemes has been studied, i.e., electric propulsion, CW plasma propulsion, photonic laser propulsion, pulsed plasma propulsion and ablative laser propulsion (ALP) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In ALP, the material is ablated using an intense pulsed laser beam, which produces plasma and as a result of this plasma impulse is produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He proposed to use laser in an indirect manner (i.e., remote energy source) instead of ablating the propellant by using chemical or electrical means. Different propulsion schemes has been studied, i.e., electric propulsion, CW plasma propulsion, photonic laser propulsion, pulsed plasma propulsion and ablative laser propulsion (ALP) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. In ALP, the material is ablated using an intense pulsed laser beam, which produces plasma and as a result of this plasma impulse is produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%