2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2003.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of checkpoint responses triggered by DNA polymerase inhibition versus DNA damaging agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
37
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A DNA damage response can also be visualized by accumulation of the variant histone protein, H2AX, which is phosphorylated at the γ position (γH2AX) at sites of DNA damage and repair. 50,51 Consistent with the HU results, approximately 54.8 ± 3.1% of Id3-infected β-cells also expressed nuclear γH2AX, compared with fewer than 2.6 ± 1.3% of LacZ-infected β-cells (Fig. 3A-C).…”
Section: E and F)supporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A DNA damage response can also be visualized by accumulation of the variant histone protein, H2AX, which is phosphorylated at the γ position (γH2AX) at sites of DNA damage and repair. 50,51 Consistent with the HU results, approximately 54.8 ± 3.1% of Id3-infected β-cells also expressed nuclear γH2AX, compared with fewer than 2.6 ± 1.3% of LacZ-infected β-cells (Fig. 3A-C).…”
Section: E and F)supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similarly, histone H2AX is rapidly phosphorylated 52 in response to S phase DNA doublestrand breaks. 51,72 Thus, our observation that γH2AX colocalized with foci containing BrdU and that 53BP1 relocalized in Id3-expressing β-cells is entirely consistent with a repair response. Further evidence for a repair response in Id3 expressing β-cells came from hydroxyurea treatment (HU) which preferentially inhibits BrdU incorporation in replicating cells.…”
Section: Disclosure Of Potential Conflicts Of Interestsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…2, panels A and B; Supplemental Figure 3A). UVA induction of γ-H2AX foci formation was previously shown [44] and is probably the consequence of oxidized DNA lesions [45,46] creating sites of single strand DNA and/or stalled replication forks that could also be sites for γ-H2AX foci formation [47][48][49][50]. UVA treated wild-type and Aag−/− cell cultures had many cells with 11-30 foci per cell by 6 hours after treatment (data not shown) but very few cells with >50 foci per cell (12% for both wild-type and Aag−/−; Fig.…”
Section: Induction Of γ-H2ax Foci Following Uva Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, γ-H2AX foci have also been shown to be induced by agents that do not cause DSBs directly, such as UVA [44], MMS [47][48][49]54,55], and Angelicin [19]. In these cases it is believed that either the formation of a single strand break generated during the processing of oxidized or alkylated DNA bases subsequently lead to DSBs [55], or that γ-H2AX foci can be formed at sites of ssDNA, and/or at stalled replication forks [47][48][49][50]. In our experiments we see a maximal induction of γ-H2AX foci 28 hours after TMP+UVA treatment that would be expected for DSB formation as a part of the ICL repair mechanism [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation