2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ceramic and polymeric membrane permeability and fouling using surface water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
160
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
160
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mueller et al [7] observed less hydraulically irreversible fouling on a TiO 2 membrane with Al 2 O 3 support than on a polyethersulfone (PES) polymeric membrane during surface water filtration, probably due to less biopolymer fouling on the TiO 2 membrane as determined by liquid chromatography with an organic carbon detector (LC-OCD). Hofs et al [6] also reported less hydraulically irreversible fouling on ceramic membranes in comparison with a polymeric one, and they attribute this to a higher volume/area ratio on the tested ceramic membranes modules resulting in different hydraulic conditions. When filtrating algae organic matter (AOM) released from Microcystis aeruginosa, a dominant cyanobacterium in reservoirs or lakes during seasonal algae bloom, the hydrophilic fractions in AOM contribute to the hydraulically irreversible fouling on a ceramic membrane (ZrO 2 -TiO 2 ) [8], while the hydrophobic fractions were mainly found in the irreversible fouling layer of a polymeric membrane (PES) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mueller et al [7] observed less hydraulically irreversible fouling on a TiO 2 membrane with Al 2 O 3 support than on a polyethersulfone (PES) polymeric membrane during surface water filtration, probably due to less biopolymer fouling on the TiO 2 membrane as determined by liquid chromatography with an organic carbon detector (LC-OCD). Hofs et al [6] also reported less hydraulically irreversible fouling on ceramic membranes in comparison with a polymeric one, and they attribute this to a higher volume/area ratio on the tested ceramic membranes modules resulting in different hydraulic conditions. When filtrating algae organic matter (AOM) released from Microcystis aeruginosa, a dominant cyanobacterium in reservoirs or lakes during seasonal algae bloom, the hydrophilic fractions in AOM contribute to the hydraulically irreversible fouling on a ceramic membrane (ZrO 2 -TiO 2 ) [8], while the hydrophobic fractions were mainly found in the irreversible fouling layer of a polymeric membrane (PES) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Ceramic membranes can be made to have fairly uniform pores in size, but defects, if occur in the ceramic membranes, will ruin the permeate water quality [4]. It is also reported that ceramic membranes offer a better permeate water quality and exhibit a lower trans-membrane pressure (TMP) increase than polymeric membranes due to their higher porosity and more uniform pores [5,6]. However, fouling on ceramic membranes, especially the hydraulically irreversible fouling, can still be severe, with consequences for increased operational costs and energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to further chemical cleaning, the normalized flux was measured with DW to determine chemically reversible fouling. [10] The CIP procedure was determined according to the literature [17,[21][22][23][24] and some preliminary trial-and-error tests with different chemical agents, concentrations and temperatures. After the CIP process, normalized flux with DW was observed again and any remaining membrane blockage was considered as chemically irreversible fouling.…”
Section: Flux Recoverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the polymeric membranes widely adopted in wastewater treatment applications display relatively low thermal and chemical resistance. There has been an upsurge of interest in ceramic membranes for the treatment of high-strength wastewater, for which polymeric membranes are not suitable [4,5]. Ceramic membranes consisting of metal oxides usually exhibit high membrane porosity, membrane permeability, and narrow distribution of the membrane pore size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%