2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cellular strain with applied substrate strain in vitro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This system can have a better control of waveforms at low and high amplitudes through a computer-regulated bioreactor. Although the Flexcell system does have some limitations (Vande Geest et al, 2004;Wall et al, 2007;Milne et al, 2009;Saminathan et al, 2012), this system still remains the most effective way to screen cells for the expression of mechano-responsive gene in vitro methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system can have a better control of waveforms at low and high amplitudes through a computer-regulated bioreactor. Although the Flexcell system does have some limitations (Vande Geest et al, 2004;Wall et al, 2007;Milne et al, 2009;Saminathan et al, 2012), this system still remains the most effective way to screen cells for the expression of mechano-responsive gene in vitro methodology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the advent of two-dimensional (2D) substrates for cell culture that spans a range of physiologic stiffnesses 3,7 that can be used to apply force to cells, and whose deformations can be used to report cellular forces. [8][9][10][11] However, despite their utility, these tools are not well suited to address the broader field of tissue remodeling and morphogenesis because the complex reorganization and deformations that occur in 3D are not captured in these 2D settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the small footprint beneath the cell, tensile stretching of individual adherent cells is technically demanding, and schemes that allow larger cell substrates to be actuated while retaining the cell within a microscopic field of view have begun to emerge (Serrell et al 2007;Wall et al 2007;Gerstmair et al 2009). However, until now these approaches have involved the application of nonhomogenous substrate strains, and more importantly have failed to yield viable measures of cell stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%