2023
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cataract surgery outcomes in English proficient and limited English proficiency patients

Abstract: We demonstrate differences in cataract outcomes in patients with limited English proficiency compared with their English proficient counterparts. Further research is needed to understand the root causes of those differences.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limited English proficiency, defined as needing or preferring an interpreter, also served as a factor that affected outcomes. Patients with limited English proficiency were more likely to have mature cataracts (5.1% versus 2.3%) and more likely to be considered complex (27.8% versus 15.3%) [22]. These details show an often-overlooked reality for some of our patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Limited English proficiency, defined as needing or preferring an interpreter, also served as a factor that affected outcomes. Patients with limited English proficiency were more likely to have mature cataracts (5.1% versus 2.3%) and more likely to be considered complex (27.8% versus 15.3%) [22]. These details show an often-overlooked reality for some of our patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Similar to our study, Gill et al found significantly more mature cataracts and worse preoperative visual acuity in patients with LEP. They defined patients as LEP, who self-identified as needing or preferring an interpreter in medical encounters [ 25 ]. However, as ethnicity and language proficiency are not documented routinely, the effect of these factors may remain undetected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%