2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cardiac computed tomography versus cardiac magnetic resonance for characterization of left atrium anatomy before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both papers were retrospective, while one of them included only a limited number of subjects and, in particular, neither of these two papers also evaluated the effect of the MDCT technique on performance, parameters and results of subsequent CA (7,10). The aims of our study were to provide a prospective, randomized, blinded comparison of MDCT image quality between the ECG-gated and helical non-gated techniques, comparison of the radiation dose between the two methods, and, since most centers prefer the MDCT of LA using ECG gating, an evaluation of the effect of MDCT data quality on the ablation process (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both papers were retrospective, while one of them included only a limited number of subjects and, in particular, neither of these two papers also evaluated the effect of the MDCT technique on performance, parameters and results of subsequent CA (7,10). The aims of our study were to provide a prospective, randomized, blinded comparison of MDCT image quality between the ECG-gated and helical non-gated techniques, comparison of the radiation dose between the two methods, and, since most centers prefer the MDCT of LA using ECG gating, an evaluation of the effect of MDCT data quality on the ablation process (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently it has been proven that there are no significant movement of the oesophagus in the short term [ 25 ]. Based on this consideration, on the fact that CTA and MRA provide similar information before RFCA [ 29 ] and that the contrast-enhanced sequences seem to be highly sensitive and specific for diagnosing LA or LA appendage thrombus [ 30 ], a pre-procedural assessment based on an MRA with oral administration of concentrated pineapple for visualisation of the oesophagus a few hours before RFCA could represent the all-in-one pre-procedural imaging examination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aims of our study were to provide a prospective, randomized, blinded comparison of MDCT image quality between the ECG-gated and helical non-gated techniques and a comparison of the radiation dose between the two methods, as well as an evaluation of the effect of MDCT data quality on the ablation process since most centers prefer the MDCT of LA using ECG gating [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%