2016
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.188102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of cancer cells cultured in 2D vs 3D reveals differences in AKT/mTOR/S6-kinase signaling and drug response

Abstract: Three-dimensional (3D) cancer models are used as preclinical systems to mimic physiologic drug responses. We provide evidence for strong changes of proliferation and metabolic capacity in three dimensions by systematically analyzing spheroids of colon cancer cell lines. Spheroids showed relative lower activities in the AKT, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and S6K (also known as RPS6KB1) signaling pathway compared to cells cultured in two dimensions. We identified spatial alterations in signaling, as the l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
279
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(307 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
23
279
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our soft 3D environments, basal and drug-stimulated signaling were significantly suppressed, in agreement with other data in spheroids and on soft substrates 4345 . JNK appears to be a broad adaptive response 46, 47 ; however, MLR identified MEK as the most significant driver of ECM-mediated resistance to sorafenib.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our soft 3D environments, basal and drug-stimulated signaling were significantly suppressed, in agreement with other data in spheroids and on soft substrates 4345 . JNK appears to be a broad adaptive response 46, 47 ; however, MLR identified MEK as the most significant driver of ECM-mediated resistance to sorafenib.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We found that the drug resistance or sensitivity between 2D and 3D differed due to dimensionality and the presence or absence of ECM and ECs. [ 51 ] Mix was inappropriate to measure hepatic toxicity due to the largest value of standard deviation (SD). Subsequently, as shown in Figure A, we obtained multiscaled hepatic lobes by layer‐by‐layer deposition of hepatic lobules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various kinds of in vitro and in vivo experimental models have been exploited to investigate the basic and applied researches on oncology . Among conventional tumor models, 2D monolayers are routinely utilized in culture of cancer cells on thermoplastics for metastatic study and drug screening due to the advantages of reproductivity, easy availability, low cost, and ease of operation …”
Section: Microfluidic Platforms For Engineered Tumor Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D monolayer culture model cannot recapitulate the native tissue's 3D architecture, features of cancel cell dormancy, hypoxia, and antiapoptosis as well as cell–matrix and cell–cell interactions . As the 2D culture does not truly mimic 3D TME, cellular signaling and drug sensitivity of cancer cells cultured on 2D or 3D models are disparate . Furthermore, the shape and fate of cells cultured on 2D monolayer model are different from those living in native tissues, which is influential in a series of signal transduction, cellular functions (e.g., proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis), response to external stimuli, and drug resistance .…”
Section: Microfluidic Platforms For Engineered Tumor Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%