1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(99)00149-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of calculated hydrocarbon strain energies using ab initio and composite methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years studies of ring strain have included larger hydrocarbons [23][24][25][26] and other homocyclic systems [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Relatively few studies, however, have dealt with the computation of strain energy in heterocyclic systems [10,[33][34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years studies of ring strain have included larger hydrocarbons [23][24][25][26] and other homocyclic systems [27][28][29][30][31][32]. Relatively few studies, however, have dealt with the computation of strain energy in heterocyclic systems [10,[33][34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various reactions have been suggested in the literature ranging from isogyric to isodesmic to homodesmotic forms [37,38]. Among them, the relatively accurate is homodesmotic schemes [39][40][41][42][43] in which not only the number of various bonds is conserved but also the valence environment around each atom is preserved to raise the advantage of canceling of systematic errors [44].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DFT methods have been proved accurate for computing HOF through appropriate reactions [21][22][23][24][25][62][63][64][65]. In the present work, we calculated the HOFs of S1 and S2 by reaction (1) and (2) Table 4 collects the total energies (E 0 ) and SEs of the species involved in the reactions.…”
Section: Strain Energy and Heat Of Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometric parameters for 1 have been reported at the Hartree-Fock (HF) and MP2 levels by Balaji and Michl [3], who found that the molecule belongs to the C 2V point group. The structure is highly strained and calculated strain energies of 109.8 kcal/mol at the HF/6-31G(d,p) level [3] and 106.5 kcal/mol at the QCISD(T)/6-311ϩG(2df,p)/ MP2/6-311G(d,p) level [4] have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The sixcarbon analog, tricyclo[3.1.0.0 2,6 ]hexane (3), has been shown to follow a conrotatory process leading to the (E,Z)-1,3-cyclohexadiene intermediate (4), which subsequently isomerizes to give cyclohexadiene (5) (Scheme 1). However, the intermediate 4 is a shallow minimum on the potential energy surface with an activation barrier of only 2.8 kcal/mol for trans double-bond rotation [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%