Comparison of Butterflies, Bats and Beetles as Bioindicators Based on Four Key Criteria and DNA Barcodes

Abstract

Informed conservation decision-making requires meaningful biodiversity assessment, yet performing an inventory of all species present at a site is an impossibility. A small group of species is frequently used as a proxy for "total" biodiversity, and various attributes required by bioindicator groups have been suggested. We synthesized these suggestions as four key criteria: i) tractable taxonomy, ii) easily surveyed, iii) broadly distributed higher taxa but specialized species, and iv) diversity patterns reflected in other groups; and compare three groups-bats, beetles and butterflies-against these criteria to evaluate their potential as bioindicators in Malaysia. DNA barcodes from butterflies, bats and beetles sampled during standardized surveys at Rimba Ilmu Botanic Garden and Ulu Gombak Forest Reserve were sorted into molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTU) and assigned species and family names. Beetle and butterfly sampling required a similar number of person-hours per species, which was an order of magnitude lower than that required for bat sampling. It was easier to generate DNA barcodes for butterflies and bats than for beetles and the number of MOTU assigned a species and/or family name was higher for butterflies and bats (>82%) than for beetles. Most butterfly and bat families were found at both sites but the species of all three groups showed little overlap between sites (<15%). The species richnesses of all three groups were correlated with each other, but only bat and butterfly species richness was strongly correlated and statistically significant. Based on the four criteria, butterflies showed greatest potential as bioindicators.

Can butterflies cope with city life? Butterfly diversity in a young megacity in southern China

“…However, the species richness of fruit-feeding nymphalids has been reported to increase with age of secondary forest fragments on Sulawesi, Indonesia, as the temperature and humidity are regulated by the increased canopy density (Veddeler et al 2005). Although several studies have suggested the pattern of species distribution along rural-urban gradients are affected by the surrounding landscape matrix (Öckinger et al 2009;Lizée et al 2012;Syaripuddin et al 2015), we found no clear association between the park species richness and the distance of the park from the urban core (the central business district)-similar to findings in Guangzhou (Li et al 2009) and Kuala Lumpur (Sing et al 2016).…”

Butterfly Assemblages of Two Wetlands: Response of Biodiversity to Different Environmental Stressors in Sierra Leone

“…The close association between grasses and Satyrine species in this study could signal a higher potential for use as indicators of forest condition. Such an attribute can be beneficially exploited to help direct limited conservation resources in economically disadvantaged areas and for prioritising conservation efforts such as identifying priority sites for formal protection or steering restoration efforts [27]. Another reason that could account for these variations in species compositions between the two study areas is the extent and impact of human activities or environmental stressors such as agricultural expansion and intensification, infrastructure development, settlement expansion and pollution which according to Bonebrake et al [4] and Gardner et al…”

Application of DNA barcodes in wildlife conservation in Tropical East Asia

“…A biodiversity inventory is simply a list of biological entities at a site (Stork & Davies ), but it is essential data for those tasked with managing and conserving biodiversity (e.g., providing justification for gazetting protected areas) (Syaripuddin et al. ). Biodiversity inventories take time and expertise.…”