1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291700000696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bulimic and non-bulimic anorexia nervosa patients during treatment

Abstract: SynopsisBulimic and non-bulimic anorexics were compared on psychological variables during a hospital treatment study. Although before treatment bulimic anorexics displayed more overall psychopathology than non-bulimics, many of the differences disappeared with treatment. There was no difference in severity of depression or body size estimation in these groups both before and with treatment. There was no difference in treatment response as measured by rate of weight gain. More expression of discomfort by bulimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings for BDI scores are similar to the range of values published by others for underweight anorexics (Casper, Hedeker, & McClough, 1992;Wambolt, Kaslow, Swift, & Ritholz, 1987;Eckert, Halmi, Marchi, & Cohen, 1987), short-term recovered anorexics (Wambolt et al, 1987;Eckert et al, 1987) and recovered anorexics (Casper et al, 1992). For the Hamilton Depression inventory, the scores in our study were similar to the range of values published by others for underweight anorexics Rosen, Murkofsky, Steckler, & Skolnick, 1989;Wambolt et al, 1987;Eckert et al, 1987) and short-term recovered anorexics (Wambolt et al, 1987;Ecker et al, 1987). To our knowledge, this instrument has not previously been administered to recovered anorexics.…”
Section: Depressionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings for BDI scores are similar to the range of values published by others for underweight anorexics (Casper, Hedeker, & McClough, 1992;Wambolt, Kaslow, Swift, & Ritholz, 1987;Eckert, Halmi, Marchi, & Cohen, 1987), short-term recovered anorexics (Wambolt et al, 1987;Eckert et al, 1987) and recovered anorexics (Casper et al, 1992). For the Hamilton Depression inventory, the scores in our study were similar to the range of values published by others for underweight anorexics Rosen, Murkofsky, Steckler, & Skolnick, 1989;Wambolt et al, 1987;Eckert et al, 1987) and short-term recovered anorexics (Wambolt et al, 1987;Ecker et al, 1987). To our knowledge, this instrument has not previously been administered to recovered anorexics.…”
Section: Depressionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Relevant to the latter point, Eckert et al (1987) found that several apparent personality differences between restrictors and bulimics disappeared after a month of inpatient weight restoration. They speculated that some that have been reported in the literature might be due to symptoms of acute illness, or simply to a tendency for bulimics to complain more about such symptoms.…”
Section: More Complex Modelsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…One is the need for analyses that combine search for distinctive traits with evaluation of per-as measures of personality. Eckert et al (53) found that several apparent personality differences between restrictors and bulimics disappeared after a month of inpatient weight restoration. They speculated that some that have been reported in the literature might be due to symptoms of acute illness, or simply to a tendency for bulimics to complain more about such symptoms.…”
Section: Unsolved Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%