Comparison of Breastfeeding Outcomes Between Using the Laid-Back and Side-Lying Breastfeeding Positions in Mothers Delivering by Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Puapornpong, Pawin; Raungrongmorakot, Kasem; Laosooksathit, Wipada; Hanprasertpong, Tharangrut; Ketsuwan, Sukwadee

doi:10.1089/bfm.2016.0193

Cited by 15 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The current study was supported by the article on comparison of breast feeding outcomes between using laid back and side lying positions among mothers with cesarean section by Puapornpong et al, 21 Thailand. The maternal comfort rating scales were assessed along with LATCH score which can also be called as infant feeding behavior.…”

Section: Section 2: Identification Of the Maternal Comfort And Infantsupporting

confidence: 58%

Comparison of Two Breastfeeding Positions on Maternal Comfort and Infant Feeding Behaviors through Video Teaching among Postnatal Mothers

D'Souza¹,

Thomas

Paul

2019

Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction Breastfeeding is not a choice but it is a responsibility. While breastfeeding may not seem the right choice for every parent, it is the best choice for every baby. Antenatal education motivates the mothers who are undergoing Cesarean section to prepare themselves, so as to establish a wonderful efficient latch. The aim of this study was to conclude which breastfeeding position may be the best choice for the mother with Caesarean section. The objectives of the study were (1) to identify the maternal comfort and infant feeding behaviors in groups 1 and 2, (2) to compare the maternal comfort and infant feeding behaviors between the groups, and (3) to find the association between maternal comforts with selected demographic characteristics. The literature also very well supports that especially the mothers with Cesarean section achieve very good maternal comfort, greater satisfaction, and favorable infant feeding behaviors in side-lying position. Thus, the researcher attempts to compare the cradle hold and side-lying breastfeeding position in terms of maternal comfort and efficient latch. Materials and Methods An evaluative research approach was used and the design selected for the study was quasiexperimental for two groups posttest only. Sample comprised of 70 antenatal mothers with elective Cesarean section (35 in each group) admitted at K.S. Hegde Hospital in Deralakatte, Mangalore. Purposive sampling technique was used to select the samples. Data were collected by using demographic proforma, maternal comfort rating scale, and infant behavior checklist. Results The results of the study shows that there was significant difference in the mean posttest scores between cradle hold and side-lying breastfeeding position. Mothers from the side-lying breastfeeding position group showed higher maternal comfort, mean posttest score, and favorable infant feeding behaviors than the cradle hold breastfeeding position. The independent sample t test revealed that the calculated t value for maternal comfort and infant feeding behaviors within the group and between the group less than the table value t (0.05, 68 = −2.042). Conclusion This study explores that mothers with Cesarean section show greater maternal comfort and favorable infant feeding behaviors in side-lying breastfeeding position between the groups and within the groups than the cradle hold.

show abstract

Section: Section 2: Identification Of the Maternal Comfort And Infantsupporting

confidence: 58%

Comparison of Two Breastfeeding Positions on Maternal Comfort and Infant Feeding Behaviors through Video Teaching among Postnatal Mothers

D'Souza¹,

Thomas

Paul

2019

Journal of Health and Allied Sciences NU

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3. For the judgement of bias arising from the randomization process, nine studies were judged to be at low risk of bias and two studies were judged to raise some concerns because ve studies [31][32][33][34][35] didn't mention random components in the sequence generation process, and two studies [36,37] concealed the allocation sequence by envelopes which were sequentially numbered, sealed with a tamper-proof seal and opaque. All the studies were judged to be at low risk of bias in the judgement of bias due to deviations from intended interventions, bias due to missing outcome data and bias in measurement of the outcome.…”

Section: Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the judgement of bias in selection of the reported result, there was only one study [38] judged to raise some concerns because the trial didn't analyze in accordance with a pre-speci ed plan. The results of overall risk-of-bias are as follows: Two trials [36,37] were judged to be at low risk of bias for all domains. Nine trials [31][32][33][34][35][38][39][40][41] were judged to raise some concerns in one domain.…”

Section: Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Position Comfortmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four studies [32,33,36,42] reported the data of position comfort, and these studies including 660 couples of postpartum women and their newborns. There were two dichotomous outcome data [32,42] and two continuous outcome data [33,36] among them. The results of the heterogeneity test showed that there was substantial heterogeneity among these studies (χ 2 = 25.58, p < 0.0001, I 2 = 88%) using the heterogeneity test, probably because of the different deliver modes.…”

Section: Position Comfortmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effectiveness of Laid-back Position on Lactation Related Nipple problems and comfort: A meta-analysis

Zhi

LIU

Min

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract Background The importance of breastfeeding for maternal and child health has become an international consensus. However, it has been found that lactation-related nipple problems are common and there are some important factors affecting the effectiveness of breastfeeding. Multiple studies recommended the laid-back breastfeeding, but the researches are on various levels of quality and the results are controversial.Methods We systematically searched the following twelve databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Ovid, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus, SinoMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and VIP from inception to January 28,2020. All studies reporting the laid-back breastfeeding or biological nurturing were considered, regardless of they are randomized controlled trials. Two trained investigators independently evaluated the quality of the included the articles and screened the data. All the data were analyzed separately using Review Manager Version 5.3 and STATA/SE Version 15.1. Results A total of 12 studies involving 1,936 groups of postpartum women and their newborns were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that nipple trauma (RR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.29,0.75; p < 0.002), nipple pain (RR = 0.25; 95% CI 0.20,0.32; p < 0.00001), the correct posture of latching (RR = 1.22; 95% CI 1.11,1.33; p < 0.00001)and position comfort (ES = 0.01; 95%CI -0.28,0.30; p = 0.006) of experimental group were all better than control group, and the differences were statistically significant ( p < 0.05), which indicates that the laid-back position has a positive effect on maternal breastfeeding. Conclusion Laid-back position has significant advantages in decreasing the incidence of nipple trauma and nipple pain compared with traditional breastfeeding postures, and it appears that laid-back position is conducive to the correct posture of latching. However, current evidence does not show different breastfeeding outcomes in the two groups of position comfort. Laid-back position is helpful to solve lactation-related nipple problems and it can be used as a recommended position for breastfeeding. Key words: Breast-feeding, Biological Nurturing, Laid-back Breastfeeding, Meta-Analysis

show abstract

The effect of biological nurturing on breastfeeding success and self-efficacy in primiparous women: a randomized controlled study

Öztaş,

Aksoy Derya

2024

Early Child Development and Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparison of Breastfeeding Outcomes Between Using the Laid-Back and Side-Lying Breastfeeding Positions in Mothers Delivering by Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cited by 15 publications

References 17 publications

Comparison of Two Breastfeeding Positions on Maternal Comfort and Infant Feeding Behaviors through Video Teaching among Postnatal Mothers

Comparison of Two Breastfeeding Positions on Maternal Comfort and Infant Feeding Behaviors through Video Teaching among Postnatal Mothers

The Effectiveness of Laid-back Position on Lactation Related Nipple problems and comfort: A meta-analysis

The effect of biological nurturing on breastfeeding success and self-efficacy in primiparous women: a randomized controlled study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About