2013
DOI: 10.1177/0363546513490647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Bone Tunnel and Suture Anchor Techniques in the Modified Broström Procedure for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability

Abstract: The bone tunnel and suture anchor techniques of the modified Broström procedure showed similar good functional and radiographic outcomes. Both techniques appear to be effective and reliable methods for the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1966, Broström12 was the first to describe direct repair of a remnant ATFL ligament with suture. In 1980, Gould et al 13 modified this procedure with advancement of the inferior extensor retinaculum; this procedure was further modified by Hu et al, 14 who used bone tunnels or suture anchors to repair both the ATFL and CFL back to the fibula. Patients whose ligament’s remnants are preserved are good candidates for reconstruction with the modified Broström-Gould procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1966, Broström12 was the first to describe direct repair of a remnant ATFL ligament with suture. In 1980, Gould et al 13 modified this procedure with advancement of the inferior extensor retinaculum; this procedure was further modified by Hu et al, 14 who used bone tunnels or suture anchors to repair both the ATFL and CFL back to the fibula. Patients whose ligament’s remnants are preserved are good candidates for reconstruction with the modified Broström-Gould procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Biomechanical studies on rotator cuff repair techniques have compared transosseous tunnels versus traditional suture anchors and shown that transosseous tunnels provided more contact and greater distribution of contact pressures than traditional suture anchor fixation. 3,18 In a biomechanical study by Park et al, 19 transosseous-equivalent suture anchor fixation was compared with traditional single-row suture anchors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is stronger, more secure, has remote chances of cut out of sutures without any additional increase in the cost of surgery [5]. Suture anchors are relatively expensive, with chances of pull out of anchors, anchor breakage, metal irritation, sterile inflammation and infection [6]. Bioabsorbable anchors which are a more desirable alternative to metallic fixation are advantageous in that they reduce the complications associated with the use of metal [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%