1983
DOI: 10.1007/bf02405064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bone apatite in osteoporotic and normal Eskimos

Abstract: An infrared and x-ray diffraction study of osteoporotic and normal, archaeological Eskimo bones. Osteoporotic bone apatite is greater in crystal size and/or perfection and lower in CO3 than normal bone apatite.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the material properties between osteoporotic and 'normal' material, particularly derived from X-ray diffraction, are not consistent across the literature [17,24,27,35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Differences in the material properties between osteoporotic and 'normal' material, particularly derived from X-ray diffraction, are not consistent across the literature [17,24,27,35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Perhaps of most relevance are those reports detailing differences between osteoporotic and 'normal' tissues, although inconsistencies are frequent. For example, reports such as those of Thompson et al [17] and Faibish and Boskey [34] suggested an increase in crystallite size in osteoporotic tissue. However, these two reports differ in conclusions regarding the crystal chemistry;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other studies have also examined bone loss in archaeological Arctic material with bone core analysis, whereby photon-absorptiometry, histomorphometry, and measures of cortical thickness are performed on a bone core that is sampled from the femoral midshaft (Laughlin et al, 1979;Thompson et al, 1981). Bone core studies of different archaeological Inuit skeletons, when compared with U.S. whites, show thinner cortices, lower bone mineral content, and increased secondary osteonal remodeling, suggestive of an increase in intracortical porosity and subsequent bone loss (Thompson et al, 1981(Thompson et al, , 1983Thompson and Gunness-Hey, 1981). Yet another geographic area in which archaeological bone mass is extensively examined is Sudanese Nubia.…”
Section: Bone Mass In Fast Populationsmentioning
confidence: 96%