Comparison of body mass index with waist circumference and skinfold-based percent body fat in firefighters: adiposity classification and associations with cardiovascular disease risk factors

Abstract

firefighters had substantially higher CVD risk profiles. Obesity and overweight were less prevalent in female and Asian male firefighters. Conclusions BMI overestimated the prevalence of total overweight and obesity among male firefighters, compared to WC and skinfold-based PBF. Overweight by BMI needs to be more narrowly defined, or the prevalence of BMI-based overweight (27.5-29.9 kg/m 2 ) should be reported additionally for prevention of CVD among male firefighters.Keywords California · Professional firefighters · Obesity · Overweight · Ethnicity · Gender IntroductionObesity is a well-documented risk factor for chronic diseases such as hypertension, coronary heart disease, osteoarthritis, dyslipidemia, type II diabetes, some cancers as well as increased mortality (Flegal et al. 2013 . The prevalence of obesity in the working population of the USA as in the general population has increased, particularly over the last three decades (Caban et al. 2005). Male firefighters are among the top three occupational groups with the highest obesity prevalence in the USA (Caban et al. 2005;Choi et al. 2011;Haddock et al. 2011). As a result, overweight and obesity is an important occupational health issue to be urgently addressed for the 1.1 million US firefighters ) who are at high risk of on-duty cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality (Geibe et al. 2008;Kales et al. 2007) and musculoskeletal injuries Poplin et al. 2012). AbstractPurpose This study aims to examine whether body mass index (BMI) overestimates the prevalence of overweight or obese firefighters when compared to waist circumference (WC) and skinfold-based percent body fat (PBF) and to investigate differential relationships of the three adiposity measures with other biological cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Methods The adiposity of 355 (347 males and eight females) California firefighters was assessed using three different measures. Other CVD risk factors (high blood pressure, high lipid profiles, high glucose, and low VO 2 max) of the firefighters were also clinically assessed. Results The prevalence of total overweight and obesity was significantly (p < 0.01) higher by BMI (80.4 %) than by WC (48.7 %) and by PBF (55.6 %) in male firefighters. In particular, the prevalence of overweight firefighters was much higher (p < 0.01) by BMI (57.3 %) than by WC (24.5 %) and PBF (38.3 %). 60-64 % of male firefighters who were assessed as normal weight by WC and PBF were misclassified as overweight by BMI. When overweight by BMI was defined as 27.5-29.9 kg/m 2 (vs. the standard definition of 25.0-29.9 kg/m 2 ), the agreement of the adiposity classification increased between BMI and other two adiposity measures. Obese firefighters had the highest CVD risk profiles across all three adiposity measures. Only when overweight by BMI was defined narrowly, overweight

24‐hour work shifts, sedentary work, and obesity in male firefighters

“…(N ¼ 16), or who did not have valid information on any one of the three adiposity measures (N ¼ 10). Given the small number of female firefighters and the fact that their obesity prevalence was reported in another paper [Choi et al, 2015a], we excluded female firefighters from this study. Thus, 308 male firefighters were included in the current study.…”

“…Although the American Council on Exercise [2009] suggested 25% as the cut-point for BFP-based obesity in males, we used 24% in this study with consideration of a possible underestimation of skinfold-based BFP by 1%, on average, when compared to the underwater weighing method [Fogelholm and van Marken Lichtenbelt, 1997]. In our previous study [Choi et al, 2015a], all three obesity measures were good for identifying obese firefighters and for predicting the associations with CVD risk factors, although BMI overestimated the prevalence of overweight firefighters compared to WC and BFP.…”

“…The adiposity of the firefighters was assessed by an experienced exercise physiologist during their WEFIT medical examinations using standard assessment protocols of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and skinfold thickness-based body fat percent (BFP) (for details, see Choi et al [2015a]). The three adiposity measures were highly correlated (Spearman correlations, 0.70-0.83) [Choi et al, 2015a].…”

“…The three adiposity measures were highly correlated (Spearman correlations, 0.70-0.83) [Choi et al, 2015a]. Obese firefighters were defined with each of the three adiposity measures based on the respective standard cut-points that have been recommended by the World Health Organization [2000]: BMIs !30 kg/m 2 and WCs of >102 cm (40 in) for men.…”

Perfil antropométrico de bombeiros militares: comparação entre os grupos de trabalho operacional e administrativo

“…Deve-se salientar que o IMC isolado não tem sido considerado um indicador recomendável para pessoas praticantes de exercícios físicos regulares, uma vez que valores elevados de massa magra prejudicam sua interpretação 6,19 . Porém, ainda é um indicador bastante utilizado nas pesquisas sobre prevalência de sobrepeso e obesidade em bombeiros em outros países 4,10,12,21,22 . Em um estudo realizado com bombeiros recém-admitidos 18 evidencia-se que níveis baixos de IMC são apropriados para garantir a qualidade do desempenho profissional dos bombeiros.…”