1978
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/14/2/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of BNM-LMRI and NBS Absorbed-Dose Standards for60Co Gamma Rays

Abstract: The first comparison of national standards of absorbed dose for 6oCo gamma radiation has been carried out by the Laboratoire de Marologie des Rayonnements Ionisants (LMRI) and the National Bureau of Standards (NBS). The graphite calorimeters were compared in the LMRI 6oCo gamma-ray beam. The ratio of the response of the NBS calorimeter to the LMRI calorimeter was 1.003, with a 95% confident limit of f0.6%, and an estimated upper bound to the systematic uncertainties of ?0.3%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements were made with the calorimeter in air, not within a graphite phantom. Gap widths are not indicated by Guiho and Simoen in their 1975 article; however, a later article describes a calorimeter of the same external dimensions (Guiho et al 1978). Based on the data in the 1978 article, the calorimeter is simulated with a core of 3 mm thickness and of diameter 1.6 cm.…”
Section: Correction Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurements were made with the calorimeter in air, not within a graphite phantom. Gap widths are not indicated by Guiho and Simoen in their 1975 article; however, a later article describes a calorimeter of the same external dimensions (Guiho et al 1978). Based on the data in the 1978 article, the calorimeter is simulated with a core of 3 mm thickness and of diameter 1.6 cm.…”
Section: Correction Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 60 Co source was the one used to establish the French primary standard of exposure (air kerma). The spectrum used in simulations is taken to be that quoted by Guiho et al (1978); results are unchanged within statistics of 0.1% if 1.25 MeV is used.…”
Section: Correction Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%