2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0010508220010141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Blast Pressure Mitigation in Rubber Foam in a Blast Wave Generator and Field Test Setups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [ 7 ] conducted indoor similar model tests to study the vibration characteristics of rock and adjacent buried pipes, and the dynamic response law of pipes during the construction of underpass tunnel by drill-and-blast method. In addition, a large number of scholars have used numerical simulation to study the dynamic response of buried pipes [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Francini et al [ 11 ] used blasting numerical calculations to study the vibration law of the adjacent buried pipes and the ground surface above them, and proposed corresponding safety criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [ 7 ] conducted indoor similar model tests to study the vibration characteristics of rock and adjacent buried pipes, and the dynamic response law of pipes during the construction of underpass tunnel by drill-and-blast method. In addition, a large number of scholars have used numerical simulation to study the dynamic response of buried pipes [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Francini et al [ 11 ] used blasting numerical calculations to study the vibration law of the adjacent buried pipes and the ground surface above them, and proposed corresponding safety criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation can well explain the response law of pipeline under blasting load, but it still requires to be verified by combining the field monitoring data. [22][23][24] In addition, the structure damage of buried pipeline in service, such as material aging, corrosion defects, and other factors are rarely considered, and ignoring the influence of these factors on the dynamic response characteristics of the pipeline is inaccurate. 25 Based on the blasting excavation project of Shenzhen Metro Line 12, a full-scale blasting field test was designed and carried out to research the dynamic response of buried concrete pipelines adjacent to blasting vibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jiang et al 21 established 3D numerical model to analyze and discuss the blasting vibration effect of pipeline and soil around pipeline. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation can well explain the response law of pipeline under blasting load, but it still requires to be verified by combining the field monitoring data 22–24 . In addition, the structure damage of buried pipeline in service, such as material aging, corrosion defects, and other factors are rarely considered, and ignoring the influence of these factors on the dynamic response characteristics of the pipeline is inaccurate 25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%