1995
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4320(94)01353-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of birth weight and growth characteristics of bovine calves produced by nuclear transfer (cloning), embryo transfer and natural mating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
0
12

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
69
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Thompson et al (1995) (Wilmut and Sales, 1981) or to the oviducts of progesterone treated ewes (Kleemann et al, 1994) causes enhanced fetal growth. In cattle, in vitro procedures also affect fetal growth (Behboodi et al, 1995;Farin and Farin, 1995), but not duration of gestation (Behboodi et al, 1995), while cloning by nucleus transfer affects both (Willadsen et al, 1991;Wilson et al, 1995). The numbers of lambs and variation in birth weights in this study do not allow further conclusions regarding the possible relations between the type of manipulation, birth weight and duration of gestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thompson et al (1995) (Wilmut and Sales, 1981) or to the oviducts of progesterone treated ewes (Kleemann et al, 1994) causes enhanced fetal growth. In cattle, in vitro procedures also affect fetal growth (Behboodi et al, 1995;Farin and Farin, 1995), but not duration of gestation (Behboodi et al, 1995), while cloning by nucleus transfer affects both (Willadsen et al, 1991;Wilson et al, 1995). The numbers of lambs and variation in birth weights in this study do not allow further conclusions regarding the possible relations between the type of manipulation, birth weight and duration of gestation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This finding is supported by studies in cattle (Behboodi et al, 1995;Farin and Farin, 1995 (Willadsen et al, 1991;Wilson et al, 1995 (Behboodi et al, 1995). Thompson et al (1995) (Wilmut and Sales, 1981) or to the oviducts of progesterone treated ewes (Kleemann et al, 1994) causes enhanced fetal growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Morphologically, they showed successful reprogramming without any defects at least until the pre-implantation stage. However, it is widely acknowledged that nuclear transfer, even with embryonic blastomeres, results in increased rates of abortion throughout pregnancy, high birth weight, perinatal deaths, and poor adaptation to extra-uterine life [2,4,11]. These effects appear more extreme with somatic cell nuclear transfer [1, Second, due to the relatively small size of HanWoo calves, the chance of dystocia by large calf derived from in vitro produced embryos can be reduced, even in twin pregnancies [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the higher variation in the weight of newborn calves derived from in vitro fertilisation (IVF) may be explained by an incomplete maturation of oocytes at the time of fertilisation, it is also possible that MO concerns smaller fol-Acta Veterinaria Hungarica 51, 2003 licles yielding incompetent or partially competent oocytes. Alternatively, the higher variability in the weight of calves originating from cloning (Wilson et al, 1995) may be due to the in vitro exposure of the gametes and (or) the embryos. These questions are worthy of an experimental confirmation in a contemporary comparison of ongoing pregnancies after transfer of embryos produced in normal non-stimulated cycle and after superovulation induction, using of course the same combination of donor, bull and recipient because these parameters influence the endocrinological pattern of pregnancy (Guilbault et al, 1990).…”
Section: In Vitro Manipulations: Possible Consequences On Gene Expresmentioning
confidence: 99%