2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of biological measurement and physical estimates of space radiation in the International Space Station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality factor of the ISS was estimated to be about 1.48 on the ISS. This physically estimated value was similar to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.54, which was established by the biological measurement of chromosome aberration using frozen mouse ES cells in the MELFI freezer on the ISS [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The quality factor of the ISS was estimated to be about 1.48 on the ISS. This physically estimated value was similar to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.54, which was established by the biological measurement of chromosome aberration using frozen mouse ES cells in the MELFI freezer on the ISS [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For space experiments, we used wild-type mouse ES cells. Preparation of mouse ES cells lacking the histone H2AX gene with 129 Sv and C57BL/6 heterozygous background was performed as described before [ 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations