2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of biological behavior between early-stage adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
22
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, because the survival of surgically treated patients with early-stage cervical cancer is excellent, the magnitude of differences in RFS and OS among different histologic types is small. Previous studies have reported that the magnitude of differences in 5-year RFS and OS rates ranged from 2.0 to 9.0%, findings similar to ours (Look et al, 1996;Lai et al, 1999;Nakanishi et al, 2000;Ayhan et al, 2004;Fregnani et al, 2008). As far as we know, our series is one of the largest studies which compared the survival outcomes of early-stage AdCa and SCCa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, because the survival of surgically treated patients with early-stage cervical cancer is excellent, the magnitude of differences in RFS and OS among different histologic types is small. Previous studies have reported that the magnitude of differences in 5-year RFS and OS rates ranged from 2.0 to 9.0%, findings similar to ours (Look et al, 1996;Lai et al, 1999;Nakanishi et al, 2000;Ayhan et al, 2004;Fregnani et al, 2008). As far as we know, our series is one of the largest studies which compared the survival outcomes of early-stage AdCa and SCCa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The prognosis of patients with AdCa after RH is unclear, primarily because studies have been performed on small numbers of patients. Some of these studies found that patients with AdCa have poorer prognosis than do those with SCCa (Hopkins and Morley, 1991;Eifel et al, 1995;Look et al, 1996;Samlal et al, 1997;Lai et al, 1999;Kim et al, 2000;Nakanishi et al, 2000), whereas other reports found no differences in prognosis (AntonCulver et al, 1992;Miller et al, 1993;Shingleton et al, 1995;Grisaru et al, 2001;Ayhan et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2006;Fregnani et al, 2008;Kasamatsu et al, 2009). Therefore, the prognosis after RH and the optimal management of AdCa are still a subject of debate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In agreement with these finding, other studies have reported poorer survival only among early-stage patients with ADC who have lymph node metastasis compared with those with SCC (Nakanishi et al, 2000;Takeda et al, 2002;Rudtanasudjatum et al, 2011) while another study demonstrated a poorer survival of early-stage patients with ADC even though the clinical and pathological factors between the two groups were comparable (Park et al, 2010). In line with our findings, Fregnani et al (2008) found no significant difference in survival between earlystage patients with ADC and SCC with 5-year disease-free survival of 87.9% and 85.7% (p=0.488), respectively. In this study, the authors also found lower histological grade, lower rate of lymphovascular space invasion, deeper stromal invasion and lymph node metastasis in patients with ADC compared with those with SCC (Fregnani et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In line with our findings, Fregnani et al (2008) found no significant difference in survival between earlystage patients with ADC and SCC with 5-year disease-free survival of 87.9% and 85.7% (p=0.488), respectively. In this study, the authors also found lower histological grade, lower rate of lymphovascular space invasion, deeper stromal invasion and lymph node metastasis in patients with ADC compared with those with SCC (Fregnani et al, 2008). These findings could suggest the influence of other high-risk pathological factors rather than histology at early stage of disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation