2009
DOI: 10.1177/1545968309338190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Bilateral and Unilateral Training for Upper Extremity Hemiparesis in Stroke

Abstract: Both bilateral and unilateral training are efficacious for moderately impaired chronic stroke survivors. Bilateral training may be more advantageous for proximal arm function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was similar to that reported in one of the studies in the past [64]. Through this study, authors conclude that bilateral training is better than unilateral training in chronic stroke survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This was similar to that reported in one of the studies in the past [64]. Through this study, authors conclude that bilateral training is better than unilateral training in chronic stroke survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is agreed by [25][26][27]. When the impaired and non-impaired hands are moved symmetrically, crossed facilitatory drive from the intact hemisphere will produce increased excitability in homologous motor pathways in the impaired hand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Given 24 hours of unilateral or bilateral practice, stroke subjects produced improved motor performances for both groups, as well as proximal arm benefits for the bilateral group. 7 Further, 30 hours of variable practice bilateral arm movement rehabilitation to chronic stroke patients resulted in a higher number of blocks moved and more consistency in a sustained force production task than a control group. 6 These findings along with the current results are further evidence supporting the viability of movement based-learning in progress toward motor recovery of chronic stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%