The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2015.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of BEM and CFD results for MEXICO rotor aerodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
5
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, over-estimate was depicted by k − Realizable model at 15 m/s and k − at 20 m/s. Authors in [32,34] also made similar observations of lower accuracy at the suction surface than at the pressure surface. The accuracy is influenced by separation of flow that occurs on suction surface causing the turbulent air.…”
Section: Pressure Distributionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, over-estimate was depicted by k − Realizable model at 15 m/s and k − at 20 m/s. Authors in [32,34] also made similar observations of lower accuracy at the suction surface than at the pressure surface. The accuracy is influenced by separation of flow that occurs on suction surface causing the turbulent air.…”
Section: Pressure Distributionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Neither the RANS nor the DES results agree with the measured dynamic data, they both give much larger predictions and wider loops. The reason of these differences is still not well determined, but they may be related to the blade design and a special aerodynamic behaviour at this particular spanwise station, where a mid-span vortex exists [35]. This requires further investigations.…”
Section: Dynamic Stallmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, when it comes to the 60% span location, the agreements of both RANS and DES results with the measured data are deteriorated. The reason for this still remains open, but it may relate to the three-dimensional vortex shedding phenomenon at this particular mid-span section due to the blade design [35]. The lift and drag characteristics of the three sections extracted from the simulations have been compared with the 2D case provided by Mexnext MEXICO project [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Dynamic Stallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suzan investigated radical regenerations in HAWT blade construction. Velázquez et al, learned the construction and experiments of a 1-MW HAWT [13][14][15][16][17][18]. One could apply the study of blade design and optimization techniques on small wind-turbine rotor performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%