2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-005-0921-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bauxites from Jamaica, the Dominican Republic and Suriname

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17% lower, comparable to the average difference with the INAA data of Grant et al . (). We attribute the systematic offsets for this reference to its low Si content (0.68% m/m SiO 2 , Govindaraju ), which may have affected the use of this element as internal standard, either due to analytical uncertainty in the recommended value for this bauxite reference material, or to the low count‐rate ratio of 1.8 for the pre‐ablation blank and the analyte signal recorded in our measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…17% lower, comparable to the average difference with the INAA data of Grant et al . (). We attribute the systematic offsets for this reference to its low Si content (0.68% m/m SiO 2 , Govindaraju ), which may have affected the use of this element as internal standard, either due to analytical uncertainty in the recommended value for this bauxite reference material, or to the low count‐rate ratio of 1.8 for the pre‐ablation blank and the analyte signal recorded in our measurement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Sampaio and Enzweiler ) and INAA data for BX‐N (Bédard and Barnes ), NIST SRM 69b (Korotev ), NIST SRM 696 and NIST SRM 698 (Grant et al . ). All reference data were extracted from the GeoReM database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations