2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1288-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Balloon-Occluded Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (BRTO) Using Ethanolamine Oleate (EO), BRTO Using Sodium Tetradecyl Sulfate (STS) Foam and Vascular Plug-Assisted Retrograde Transvenous Obliteration (PARTO)

Abstract: BRTO using STS foam or PARTO is better than BRTO using EO for treatment of gastric varices in terms of complication or procedure time. However, PARTO showed frequent recurrence of gastric varices during the long-term follow-up rather than BRTO.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another advantage of PARTO and CARTO is that gelatin sponge can replace the harmful sclerosants. However, in a retrospective study, PARTO was associated with frequent recurrence of GVs (32.8%; 4/18 cases) during 1‐year follow‐up in marked contrast to BRTO with EO (3.1%; 2/34 cases) or STS foam (0%; 0/18 cases). Frequent recurrence of IGVs probably occurred because the gelatin sponge was able to embolize the GVs only temporary and did not have a sufficient effect to destruct the endothelial cell.…”
Section: Comparison Between Various Sclerosants and Balloon‐occluded mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another advantage of PARTO and CARTO is that gelatin sponge can replace the harmful sclerosants. However, in a retrospective study, PARTO was associated with frequent recurrence of GVs (32.8%; 4/18 cases) during 1‐year follow‐up in marked contrast to BRTO with EO (3.1%; 2/34 cases) or STS foam (0%; 0/18 cases). Frequent recurrence of IGVs probably occurred because the gelatin sponge was able to embolize the GVs only temporary and did not have a sufficient effect to destruct the endothelial cell.…”
Section: Comparison Between Various Sclerosants and Balloon‐occluded mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] In this process, several types of sclerosants such as EO, sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS), 29,30 and polidocanol are used [31][32][33] (Table 1). Recently, various modified BRTO techniques had been developed, including vascular plug-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (PARTO) [34][35][36] and coil-assisted retrograde transvenous obliteration (CARTO) 37 ( Table 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these potential shortcomings of EO, some researchers have tried to use foam sclerosants in BRTO. However, some complications are also associated with foam sclerosants, such as pulmonary edema and partial portal vein thrombosis [45][46][47]. In our study, no sclerosing agents were required; hence, no complications associated with sclerosing agents were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…9) However, they result in a higher recurrence rate of GV than BRTO. 10) Alternatively, we introduced the combination method of polidocanol foam for GV and NBCA glue packing to close the GRS, which remarkably shortened the procedure time, decreased the side effects of the sclerosant agent, and reduced medical costs as compared with coil or vascularplug. By choosing the brachial approach, as in this case, the patient can move immediately only with compression of the puncture site after BRTO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%