2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bacterial communities in fish farm sediments along an organic enrichment gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
56
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
56
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the observation that Gallionella and related FeOB of the Betaproteobacteria are found in freshwater environments, while FeOB related to the Zetaproteobacteria are marine (10). However, in coastal environments not influenced by hydrothermal venting, to our knowledge, there has been only one report of a single Zetaproteobacteria sequence found in sediments associated with a fish farm in Wakasa Bay, Japan (22), and no Mariprofundus-like FeOB have been isolated. The isolation of Mariprofundus sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the observation that Gallionella and related FeOB of the Betaproteobacteria are found in freshwater environments, while FeOB related to the Zetaproteobacteria are marine (10). However, in coastal environments not influenced by hydrothermal venting, to our knowledge, there has been only one report of a single Zetaproteobacteria sequence found in sediments associated with a fish farm in Wakasa Bay, Japan (22), and no Mariprofundus-like FeOB have been isolated. The isolation of Mariprofundus sp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Phylogenetic trees were constructed for SSU rRNA gene, LSU rRNA gene, and gyrB gene data sequences. Alignments were pre- Target gene and intended specificity L-C-Zeta-1541-a-S-24 CGA AGT CAG TGA TCC TAT GCT TCC LSU rRNA gene, specific for Zetaproteobacteria L-C-Zeta-1611-a-A- 22 CTC GCC TCG CCT ACC TGT GTC G LSU rRNA gene, specific for Zetaproteobacteria L-0858-a-S- 21 CTA GCC CAT CCA GTG CTC TAC LSU rRNA gene, broad specificity L-0858-a-S- 21 GTA GAG CAC TGG ATG GGC TAG LSU rRNA gene, broad specificity G-C-Zeta-2120-a-A- 23 CAG GTG ATT ATG ACC GTG CTG CA gyrB gene, modified to target Zetaproteobacteria G-C-Zeta-1099-a-S- 22 CTT GCG ATC ACG CCC CTG TTT G gyrB gene, modified to target Zetaproteobacteria a Primers were named according to the Oligonucleotide Probe Database nomenclature scheme. Base position numbers were determined by matching each primer to the sense strand of the corresponding Escherichia coli gene; the numbers reflect the E. coli 5Ј-end position number for each primer (1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mariculture has been reported to influence the spatial and temporal distribution of bacterial communities in fish farm sediment [24,32,64]. Results of this study further confirmed this observation (Figs.…”
Section: Microbial Community Distribution In Response To Environmentasupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Besides the effects on Carbon cycle pathways, marked changes have also been observed in the Sulphur cycle and the relative importance of sulphatereducing δ-Proteobacteria [13,[19][20][21]. Studying the effects of biodeposition in several fish farming areas across the Mediterranean Sea, from Cyprus to Spain, Luna et al [6] reported significantly higher prokaryotic and viral abundance and production, and rates of organic matter decomposition in the sediments beneath the cages although the differences between impact and control sediments were not consistent at all regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that fish farming mainly affected the levels of microbial activities in seawater, which were significantly increased for alkaline phosphatase, while no significant variations were recorded in heterotrophic bacterial density. But generally the most evident effects are found in the benthic compartment, especially along an organic enrichment gradient [13] and with significantly changes in its biogeochemistry [14]. Significant increases in prokaryotic abundance, biomass, carbon production and enzymatic activities are reported in the sediments beneath aquaculture cages [12,[15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%