2015
DOI: 10.17219/acem/40450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Autologous and Heterologous Bone Graft Stability Effects for Filling Maxillary Bone Gap After Le Fort I Osteotomy

Abstract: Background. The amount of postoperative maxillary relapse of two different bone graft materials after Le Fort I osteotomy were compared in this study. Objectives. The aim of this study is to compare postoperative maxillary relapse rates using heterologous and autologous graft materials after Le Fort I osteotomy. Material and Methods. A total of 80 patients who had developmental malocclusion were analyzed retrospectively in this study. Twenty nine (36.2%) and 51 (63.8%) patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classically, autogenous grafts are indicated for bone regeneration, but with the advent of new biomaterials, other alternatives are viable 4,[6][7][8] . Grafts based on bioactive glass granules are haloplasts materials capable of stimulating osteoblast differentiation and activation via the formation of silica phosphate layers [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Classically, autogenous grafts are indicated for bone regeneration, but with the advent of new biomaterials, other alternatives are viable 4,[6][7][8] . Grafts based on bioactive glass granules are haloplasts materials capable of stimulating osteoblast differentiation and activation via the formation of silica phosphate layers [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies, with longer postoperative periods have proven biomaterial efficacy as accelerators of bone formation and biocompatibility [6][7][8][9][10][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . S53P4 demonstrated potential as a non-determinant stimulator of bone repair at 6 months, and was biological compatible with maxillary sinus membrane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This implies that reliable results from studies on bovine ribs may be achieved only carrying out a relatively high number of experiments and still they should be interpreted with care. An equine material has been placed on the market as a bone substitute to be used in dentistry, maxillofacial surgery and orthopedics [23,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Interestingly, the process equine bone is subjected to manufacture this graft is a mild, collagen-preserving one, implying that equine bone blocks achieved through this process retain their trabecular structure and their original mechanic characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%